My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/24/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 06/24/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:50:56 PM
Creation date
7/7/2003 8:33:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/24/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
441
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that that was a possibility. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that that would have to be a decision made by staff. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that the involvement of the Planning Commission is a very <br />important element. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak agreed, but only if there is a quorum. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired if the site was separated into different districts would that be <br />beneficial. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied that that was a good question, but he was not prepared to <br />answer. He stated that staff understands that the Council does not want taxpayers to feel the <br />impact of the project; they want the project to balance itself. The City could look at special <br />taxing districts, as well as assessments in order to accomplish that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired if there .was a separate district, would there be a different: <br />approach the Planning could go through. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman explained that for the actual platting of the land, the Plarming <br />Commission needs to be involved, but a different committee could do the site plan review. The <br />subdivision and plat approvals need to include the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that she wanted to be careful with changing the process too <br />much because residents already have a difficult time following the normal process. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman explained that Bright Keys has been working with the City on a <br />couple of different site plans, but ~, lot of things have changed in the area with the discussion of <br />the Town Center. It was suggested by staff that the row house approach on the western portion <br />of the project would be more appropriate to flow into the Town Center. <br /> <br />Phil Dommer, Bright Keys, presented a plan for his project north of the Town Center explaining <br />that they intend on capturing the character of the Town Center. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if they should be including the Bright Keys site as part of <br />the Town Center development. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman noted that that is a discussion that will be going through the Town <br />Center Task Force. It was staff's opinion that the area fits into the Town Center project, but the <br />developer would probably like to hear that from the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that the Bright Keys site is the missing link to the Town Center <br />project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson felt that including the Bright Keys property as part of the Town Center <br />would tie the area together. <br /> <br />-36- <br /> <br />City Council Work Session/May 6, 2003 <br /> Page 10 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.