Laserfiche WebLink
In response to Chair Cook, Park/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained the Council tabled further <br />consideration of Alpine Park to allow more time for research on the land valuation. Chair Cook <br />expressed concern that there may not be enough funding to complete the anticipated projects and <br />pointed out that no funding from the General Fund is being proposed. He commented that the <br />potential exists for losing part of the landfill trust fund for park projects and it was the intention that <br />this fund would be available for park improvements for a term of five years. Chair Cook requested <br />staff propose $120,000 worth of improvements in the 1997-98 CIP with funding from the Landfill <br />Trust Fund. <br /> <br />Park/Utilities Supervisor Boos reviewed the remaining portion of the CIP. He advised the 5-year CIP <br />must be completed for public review at the June meeting. Following that, he suggested it be <br />forwarded to the Finance Committee in August with adoption anticipated in December of 1996. <br /> <br />Chair Cook suggested a Community Center and swimming pool be included by the year 2002. The <br />option of using General Fund dollars for park improvements was raised again. Park/Utilities <br />Supervisor Boos explained one advantage of not using General Fund dollars is being able to tell the <br />public that park improvements do not directly impact their tax dollars. It was noted that park <br />maintenance costs (which will increase as parks age) will probably be funded from the Maintenance <br />Fund, which is part of the General Fund. Park/Utilities Supervisor Boos commented on the need for <br />resurfacing overlays of paths on a 15-year basis and tennis courts on a seven- to eight-year basis. <br /> <br />Following a short discussion, consensus was reached that since the CIP is a "wish list" to include a <br />Community Center with recreational facilities such as a swimming pool, skating rink, racquet ball <br />court, mountain climbing, weight room, driving range, etc. <br /> <br />Case #1: REVIEW FOX PARK - CONTINUED <br /> <br />Discussion was held regarding the boardwalk and how to address resident's safety concerns. Chair <br />Cook suggested a third railing be inserted between the two existing railings to avoid the situation <br />where a toddler could fall through. <br /> <br />Consensus was reached to install a toe kick and a third railing (between the two existing railings) to <br />make the boardwalk more handicap accessible and avoid the potential of a child rolling off the <br />boardwalk. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Motion by Chair Cook and seconded by Commissioner Johns to adjourn the meeting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Cook, Commissioners Johns, Asfahl, LaMere, Ostrum and <br />Skinner. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Droegemueller. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/May 9, 1996 <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />