Laserfiche WebLink
Allow for businesses to be operated in accessory structures if the property is located <br />outside the MUSA and over 5 acres in size. <br />Allow 1 non-feinted employee if the property is accessed by a non-improved (gravel) <br />· street, 2 non-related employees if the property is accessed by a bituminous street, and <br />1 additional employee per acre for a maximum of 10 if the property is accessed by a <br />County Road. <br /> <br />Staff researched home occupation Ordinances from surrounding cities and on May 1st made <br />some recommendations to the Plann/ng Commission for amendments to the Home <br />Occupation Ordinance. <br /> <br />Staff proposed the Home Occupation Ordinance consist of three main subdivisions: <br /> <br />1. Home Occupations Exempt from Permit Requirements <br />2. Principal Dwelling Home Occupations <br />3. Accessory Structure Home Occupations <br /> <br />The proposed exemptions from the home occupation permit process is basically adopting the <br />City's current unwritten policy for allowing a self-employed person to utilize their home as a <br />phone and address base for their business if they do not have any employees or clients <br />coming to their property. <br /> <br />The Principal Dwelling Home Occupation section establishes what criteria the Planning <br />Commission and City Council have been using in the past when granting a Home Occupation <br />Permit. Staff is not proposing any major changes other than to limit the generation of <br />additional vehicular traffic. Staff is also proposing to allow retail sales of minor~ products that <br />are ancillary to the home occupation. <br /> <br />The third subdivision, Acce~ory Structure Home Occupations, directly relates to lVlr. <br />Menard's zoning amendment request. However, staff proposed several provisions that are <br />different from the applicant's request: <br /> <br />Permitted on parcels 1 acre in size or greater <br /> <br />Proposing that the parcel requirement not be <br />tired to the MUSA line but rather parcel size <br /> <br />Employees are limited to 1 full-time person <br />who does not reside on the subject property <br />and the City Council may allow up to 2 <br />employees under certain circumstances <br /> <br />Stating that certain businesses will not be <br />considered for a home occupation <br /> <br />Proposing 5 acres or greater <br /> <br />Only permitted on properties located outside <br />the MUSA <br /> <br />Proposing 1 full-time employee if the <br />property is accessed by a non-paved street, 2 <br />employees if accessed by a bituminous street, <br />and 1 additional employee for a maximum of <br />10 if the property is accessed by a County <br />Road <br /> <br />No restriction on business type <br /> <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the proposed Home <br />Occupation Ordinance at their May meeting. Citizen input during the public hearing <br />consisted of Mr. Menard and his attorney. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission directed staff to complete the following: <br /> <br /> <br />