Laserfiche WebLink
Mapl, ittg out the.future of resottrce management <br /> <br />The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) <br /> <br />he Minnesota Land Cover Classification Systen, is a relatively new tool that fills an important informa- <br />tional niche for natural resource managers and planners. Developed by the Minnesota Department of <br />Natural Resources - Metro Region, in cooperation with other state, federal and local agencies, the <br />system is unique in that it categorizes urban and built up areas in terms of land cover, rather than land <br /> <br />use. <br /> <br />Development of the MLCCS began in 1998 during efforts to conduct a natural resource inventory and manage- <br />ment plan for a portion of the Mississippi River corridor in the metro region. Existing data from aerial and satellite <br />photos was too coarse and it was presented in terms of land use o- such as industrial, commercial, residential o- <br />rather than land cover. Land use data offered little information about the amount or type of vegetation or the <br />amount of artificial surfaces such as pavement covering a parcel of property. To address these shortcomings, the <br />DNR convened a steering committee comprised of representatives from the National Park Service, the U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service, the Corps of Engineers, the Dakota Soil and Water Conservation District, Ramsey County <br />Parks, Friends of the Mississippi River and Great River Greening. The group created a hybrid system incorporat- <br />ing the National Vegetation Cl.assification System (NVCS) and the'Minnesota Natural Heritage native plant <br />community types, along with a cultural classification System to distinguish among different types and amounts of <br />land cover, vegetation and impervious surfaces. <br /> <br />The classification system consists of five hierarchical levels. At the most gen.eral level, land cover is divided into <br />either Natural/Semi-Natural cover types or Cultural cover types. The Natural/Semi-Natural classification system <br />is a hybrid of the NVCS and the Minnesota Natural Heritage plant communities. The NVCS is used for Levels 1, <br />2 and 3 of the system (the coarser levels), while Levels 4 and 5 use the Minnesota Natural Heritage system to <br />more explicitly identify plant community types <br /> <br /> Level 1 - General growth patterns (e.g. forest, woodland, shrubland, etc.) <br /> Level 2 - Plant types (e.g. deciduous, coniferous, grasslands, forbs, etc.) <br /> Level 3 - Soil hydrology (e.g. upland, seasonally flooded, saturated, etc.) <br /> Level 4 - } Plant species composition, (e.g. floodplain forest, rich fen sedge, jack pine barrens, etc.) <br /> Level 5 <br /> <br />The Cultural classification system is designed to identify built-up / vegetation patterns and an area s impervious- <br />ness to water infiltration. Most other land inventory classification systems, such as the USGS Anderson system, <br />employ land use terminology (e.g. urban, commercial, residential)i This system distinguishes among land cover <br />types at the fgllowing levels of detail: <br /> <br />Level 1 - Presence of built-up elements (i.e. built-up vs. cultivated land) <br />Level 2 - Dominant vegetation (trees, shrubs, herbaceous) <br />Level 3 - Plant type (deciduous, coniferous, etc.) <br />Level 4 - Percent of impervious surface or soil hydrology <br />Level 5 - Specific plant species <br /> <br />This cultural classification is unique in that it emphasizes vegetation land cover instead of land use, thus creating a <br />land cover inventory especially useful for resource managers and planners. <br /> <br /> For more informatiOn contact: <br />Bart Richardson, DNR-Metro GIS Coordinator, 65 !-772-6150 <br /> <br />,89 <br /> <br /> <br />