My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/12/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2002
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/12/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:54:23 AM
Creation date
7/8/2003 2:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
09/12/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> <br />there were no plans to put in irrigation on the north side, nor in the area designated for <br />expansion. There is a fence on the west side. Asphalt Technologies is the adjoining property to <br />the west. This neighbor has shared in the cost of putting iw along'_the fence in Phase 2. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nb, ct suggested the applicant work with the Staff t° resolve these issues. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nix-t, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to approve the proposed site <br />plan for T.J. & Associates Printing, with the direction to confer with Staff to resolve landscaping <br />issues, and contingent upon compliance with City Staff review letter dated May 31, 2002 and <br />Sunfish Gateway receiving .final plat approval and the Developer recording the plat at Anoka <br />County. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nix't, Commissioners Reeve, Brauer, and Kociscak. · <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson, Sweet, and Watson, <br /> <br />Case//6: <br /> <br />Request for SketCh Plan Review of Allstate Development; -Case of Allstate <br />Development <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated Allstate Development LLC has applied for sketch plan review <br />of a townhome development. The property is generally located in the triangular area formed by <br />the intersection of Nowthen Blvd, Sunfish Lake Blvd., and Alpine Dr. The property is currently <br />zoned R-1 Rural Residential. Recent amendments to the Ramsey Comprehensive Plan have <br />included the property, the M-USA and designated the land as Medium Density Residential. Under <br />the new proposed zoning map, the land will be designated as R-2, which allows for townhomes <br />and a net density of up to seven units per acre. The property is approximately 22.97 acres in size. <br />The sketch plan is proposing 20 two-unit buildings, one 4-unit building, and eight 16-unit <br />buildings and one single-family lot for a total of 157 units, which equates to a goss density of <br />6.83 units per acre. There appears to be wetlands present on the property; therefore the number <br />of units may have to be reduced in order to' comply with the net density maximum. The total <br />density attainable may also be impacted by the site plan review. He stated the new private street <br />policy requires a main public street through the project area, which this sketch plan shows. The <br />private street policy restricts priv. ate streets to 300 feet; unless a cul-de-sac is provided, then the <br />private street can be as long as 600 feet. The private streets shown appear to meet the private <br />street standards, however further review will need to be done at the preliminary plat stage. The <br />applicant is proposing to provide public roads to access Alpine Dr. and Nowthen Blvd. (CSAH <br />5). The access'on Nowthen will need Anoka County approval. The sketch plan is also showing <br />future accesses to the north and the southeast. They are surrounded by county roads and typically <br />the county doesn't want to grant' excess entrances. The city feels more than one is necessary and <br />would advocate for this. A detailed drainage and grading plan will be addressed during the <br />preliminary plat and site plan process. At the present time, there does not appear to be any <br />designated area for stormwater ponds. This will need to be shown on the drainage and grading <br />plan and may impact the total number of units allowed. The project is also subject to the review <br />and permitting process of the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (WMO) <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 6, 2002 <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.