Laserfiche WebLink
LM <br /> <br />Inside This Newsletter... <br /> <br />1. Bunker Hills Campground/Visitor Cenler is Openl <br />2. Hardwood Forest Restoration Project C,',mpleledl <br /> <br />From The Director: <br /> <br />In mid-Oclober I attended the National Recreation <br />and Park Association Annual Congress and <br />F. xposition in Tampa Bay, Florida. The conference <br />is always an excellent opportunity to see the latest <br />products and innovations in the parks and <br />recreation field, network with professionals from <br />throughout the country, and attend a variety af <br />educational sessions. Among the sessions I <br />attended this year included: facilities <br />benchmarklng, pubfic surveys, leisure trends, golf <br />course innovations, revenue making, and effective <br />lobbying, to name a few. <br /> <br />One session, which has broad applications, was <br />entitled 'What Makes a Great Park System." The <br />keyhole speaker was Dr. Robert Cramptan, <br />Professor af Parks and Recreation Administration, at <br />Texas A & M University. Dr. Crompton is one of the <br />most well known experts and researchers in the <br />leisure services field. At the 200'I NRPA Congress <br />he gathered a group of high profile park and <br />recreation administrators from across the Untied <br />States lo develop a list of parameters defining a <br />"great park system". The foflowing is a summary of <br />his conclusions from that "think tank": <br /> <br />A clear measure of purpose. Park and recreation <br />agencies should have a clear legislative mandate <br />and authority, a mission statement, and core <br />values. We are fortunate in this state to have <br />legislation supporting slate, regional, county, and <br />municipal parks, and a variety of grant-in-aid <br />programs that directly finance park land <br />acquisition, development, and natural resources <br />management. Our 2020 Vision process helped ta <br />reaffirm the long standing mission af the Ar]aka <br />County Park system and clearly articulated our <br />ethos. <br /> <br />An ongoing system plan and annual goals. These <br />documents are critical for the efficient distribution <br />of human capital and financial resources for the <br />establishment and ongoing operations of a park <br />system. Anoka County has a solid long term system <br />plan which involved significant pubfic input. The <br />plan has not only sufficiently guided the develop <br />and redevelopment of the parks system aver the <br />past five years, but has helped la justify and <br />support funding from outside agencies. The plan is <br />Implemenled and evaluated through a process of <br />annual goals, development, and accountabilih/. <br />Surc)risingly, tess than 35% of park and recreation <br />agencies in the United States have a system plan <br />that/s less than five years cid. <br /> <br />Sufficient assets in land and fundinq to meet the <br />goals of the system. Historically, park agencies <br />have found it easier to find money for new capital <br />development projects than for operations and <br />maintenance.. Dr. Crompton challenges us to <br />combine the capital investment and operations <br />costs into a consofidated budget framework, thus <br />ensuring the capital investment is sufficiently <br />balanced with operations dollars ta maintain the <br />basic system infrastructure. Fortunately, the county <br />has a weft established land base for parks, and has <br />augmented operations funding with outside <br />sources ta ensure that the systemic needs of the <br />system can be met. <br /> <br />Equitable access. Quality park and recreation <br />systems ensure that all members of the pubfic have <br />reasonably equitable access to parks, trails, and <br />open space areas. The work of our forefathers in <br />establishing a goad geographic distribution of <br />parksVn Anaka County has met this challenge head <br />on. For the future we must consider how we make <br />our parks more accessible for people of lower <br />economic status, those who are disabled, or those <br />who lack transportation alternatives. Quality park <br />agencies sufficiently meet the needs of all people. <br /> <br /> '-:' ':i. ~" .'," ' ~ <br /> <br />For the ~ure we must consider how we ~ke our parks mor~~ <br />accessible for people of lower econo~c stores, those.whO~re <br /> d~sabled, or those who lack ~ans~mat~on alt~a6v~. <br /> <br />User satisfaction. Quality park systems strive to <br />maximize user satisfaction through an optimal <br />blend of recreation facilities, customer service, <br />programs, and maintenance. Those agencies who <br />regularly measure participation rates and user <br />satisfaction, through surveys and other instruments, <br />are in the best position, to modify service defivery to <br />maximize pubfic benefit. ' We in Anoka County are <br />fortunate to partner with the Metropofitan Council <br />on annual visitor use surveys. Coupled with on- <br />going efforts to survey customers on quality <br />satisfaction we are in a good position to evaluate <br />and change our services to meet the pubfic needs. <br /> <br /> 83 <br /> <br />P~e 1 <br /> <br /> <br />