My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/10/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2001
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:58:17 AM
Creation date
7/8/2003 2:47:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
10/10/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Centex has tried to work those issues out for each area. He stated that he anticipated some <br />comments from residents regarding road connections to the north from the Centex addition and <br />wanted to note that there is not a big impact on the development if those connections are not <br />made so the decision will have to be made by the Council. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that the Council is obligated to respond to the District Court ruling <br />regarding the property and reviewed what was included in that ruling. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that the ruling did not specifically state that the City cannot <br />work with the developer on the layout of streets, trails etc. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that that was true. <br /> <br />Kerry Manuel, 15668 Juniper Ridge NnvV, Ramsey,- stated that the property has had a long history <br />and most of residents were told, when they built their homes, that the property would be <br />developed into one acre lots. He explained that the res/dents to the north of the development met <br />with the developer and have chosen to purchase a buffer zone from the developer and that [sa <br />plan they can live with. ~r. Manuel felt that the residents have done the/r part and know they <br />requested that the Council cul-de-sac the two proposed throu~ streets to the north so that traffic <br />in their neighborhood can continue with their ex/sting patterns. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak questioned the safety concerns if the streets to the north were cul-de-sacs <br />leaving no through streets to the north. <br /> <br />Fire ChiefKapler replied that from a safety standpoint more access is always better. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if it would pose an increase in danger for emergency vehicles if ' <br />the roads were cul-de-sacs. <br /> <br />Fire CtziefKapler replied that the Waco Street cul-de-sac would exceed the cul-de-sac ordinance <br />length requirement. <br /> <br />Gary Martz, 5220 - 155[~' Lane NV/, Ramsey, stated that his home [s located to the west of the <br />proposed development and he would like to see no increase in traffic along their street as well. <br />He stated that if the Council is going to allow for one cul-de-sac then all through streets, except <br />in the southern portion of the property, should be cul-de-sacs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendr/ksen inquired if other property owners were offered to purchase a buffer <br />zone. <br /> <br />Mr. Martz replied that he was never made that offer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendr/ksen inquired if Mr. Martz was pleased with the idea of having several <br />more neighbors. <br /> <br />City. Council/August 23, 2001 <br /> Page 11 oi'36 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.