Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/09/2001

Home

the park dedication fee since the sketch plan. He explained that staff met with the developer to discuss the trail construction which is to be part of Stage I improvements and will be done of the watermain restoration project. The developer has agreed to shift the east side to the northwest side of Xldmo Street and there has been a reduction of two;i~t~: Whic~7~? means the park dedication will also be reduced. Parks/Utilities Supervisor B~'~s:.:.'i!Stated this preliminary plat proposal appears to reflect the land dedication and other~.;~:~{i~i~of the Commission. He stated the meeting between staff and the developer was v~Fbducti~:!~d ..... al/' agreed the issues can be worked out to identify which improvements cotrldi.~bcur in thes~':~'.~,~ and how they could be staged. Also, the developer understands more rri'~need to be initially on the park improvements than the representative cash val )~:~. ~':'"~?~ Chairperson Cook asked if the developers agreement can defln~gke, issue!~ Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated it would do so.~Jthe Commi~si'02 can review it at the August 9, 2001 meeting. Also, at that time the exa<~.~pf lots w.i~¢i~own and the City Council can approve it the following week. after tha~ Play'~pmenf~i~idk CkI~'be requested and the Commission will have the discretionary approval of what t~'~!~¢5~ent will comprise. Chairperson Cook asked if the preliminary plat can be approved ton/ghfi:and th.?~onetary issues worked out at a subsequent meeting. ~:¢??;'~, ..... '*e{i:?~)(~ ~:::!i~) Parks/Utilities Supervisor $o0a:, a ted th~*i~{i0}~!)p~ ,~e prelimina~':(i~iat occur at the next meeting when the exact numb~i3~flots ~ik known. ~ ~'~Z?~i!~!?~?j; ~ ..... Commissioner Rolfe encouraged thatalf: kes,:. !t i a lyin the developers agreement and not remain subj.e~fi:¥e. ',?i'?i:;iiiii!?~ xe ?arks/Utilitie_s77$~brvisor B0~s a~eed that th~!:aeve!~pcrs agreement will be clearly detailed. He advised t . 'developer kg eedto exten'd', d?i ermain along with a hydrant so watering can bep~0~ed to the tree~iT:~ used for irrig~b~n the future. He reviewed the issues that the Co~SS'i~fi.~v'dl need to..:c~id~r, including~;heed for a park shelter. Consensus of th~:i~.bf~isSion was '~h~'TtI~s revised proposal meets the directives expressed by ..,,,:~:¢;'dse P:ark and Recre~i~i°SCommission at the last meeting. ' Parks/U'ti~i~ Supervisdi:5-.i~oS~!i¢~Sked the Commissioners to address pr/orities including play equipment,'~rdgation, an~d~fi'k shelter. ..... Commissioner?~hns stated her support of the projects as listed in the letter dated July 11, 2001 from Centex ~mes. She noted that commumty orgamzat~ons can be asked for donatmns w~th projects like ~rk shelter. She suggested that irrigation at Woodland Green should take priority '%:;!i~ver Bear Thbi~(~°h was raised to use char/table gambling fundrL~ :0O2 for park tables and benches. Park and Recreation Commission/July 12, 2001 Page 2 of 6