My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/09/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2001
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/09/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:57:54 AM
Creation date
7/8/2003 3:07:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
08/09/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos asked if a five-foot concrete walk along the <br /> <br /> The consensus of ~e Comssion was to support a five-foot concrete walk ~W~:Ch is more <br /> aesthetically pleas~g. <br /> <br /> Co~issioner Rolfe ~ked if the pedes~ r~ps are exposed ag~egate. <br /> <br /> P~ks~uhtles Supe~sor Boos stated he t~s ~at ~s co~ect. <br /> <br /> Case ~.. Review Sketch Plan for Proposed Bright <br /> <br /> Parks~tfl~t~es Supe~sor Boos adwsed the Co~ssro~of prel~n~?&scussmns regarding <br /> the proposed Bright Keys to,omc sketch plan to~,~e~i~,::268 tow~)~ts ~d 7 single- <br /> f~,ty lots on 44.16 acres north of Highway g 1 t6 ~ wes{*'.~fgmsd~'~°O~'~d, He advised <br /> that staff continues to work with the developer to rede the };P'~ks~tilities .Supe~iSor <br /> Boos noted the developer proposes some co~erci~ developmeJf*4~e ~tersection but it is not <br /> cuxentlv zonM co~ercial. He reviewed the issues that ~e P~k C6~ssion.~i~ be interested <br /> in such as the n~ber of bedroom u~:~:d;:~ount of recreational <br /> <br /> Co~issioner Rolfe ~ked if ~e~'af~:~&ess td~'2m~d: ~,onds P~k wd~i~:~be considered, noting <br /> ~t would revolve the need to ~0sS major:ro~s. .~;? ~.:~;~ <br /> <br /> P~ks~tilities Supe~isor Boos stated E~:~d Eo~:}":~k is~t¢3};~ away ~d noted the location <br /> of other paks, ~clu~ng relser Park. He ~~ted on theorized to reView ~e Comprehensive <br /> Plan to identi~ ~ fiS~:5~';~ ~, 5~~ <br /> co issiaako f expres aa, concem that to parks be provided to assure safeW. <br /> <br /> Cha~:e~,aaok notea:~¢~e Co~issi~:~aa not reviewed many tow~ome projects but, <br /> perhapS, a to requke.a on,site tot ~lot that does not apply <br /> <br />.,,~.'?':?~'~8~'~oner Rolfe ~Sh~ed:~d noted ~at tow~ome residents do not have enough yard ~ea <br /> <br /> Cha~erson ~k point~'~/~t that a ve~ t~ge development is berg proposed ad there should <br /> be enough ro~'f~r privately owned ~d ma~tained play equipment ~at is the burden of the <br /> tow~ome fac~ or homeowners association, not the CiW. <br /> *~(;?Co~issio~'::)oMs stated she ~s ~e ordin~ce does requke a sw~ing pool or private <br /> '::~5,m~nli~f6r mobile home p~ks. <br /> <br /> .:.-?L:'~ <br /> <br /> Park and Recreation Commissio~July 12, 2001 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.