My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/20/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2001
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/20/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:57:59 AM
Creation date
7/8/2003 3:12:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
09/20/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 Planning August 2001. <br /> <br />renewed interest in their own 19th century <br />examples. Restoration projects are under way <br />in Boston, Buffalo, Chicago, Louisville, New <br />York, Oakland, Pittsburgh, and many other <br />places. <br /> Susan Rademacher, executive director of <br />the Louisville Olmsted Parks Conservancy, <br />believes that unstructured open spaces are <br />vital to the success of a community. "I am <br />constantly surprised by the way people rein- <br />vent open spaces," she says. "You never know <br />if you're going to find kite flyers, bongo play- <br />ers, dog walkers socializing, or a rugby match. <br />Last week, I heard this incredible music and a <br />bagpiper, in full kilt, came strolling across one <br />of our wild meadows." <br /> Rademacher realizes that it is difficult to <br /> <br />sire species were allowed to take hold. Land- <br />scaping crews, unaware of the complexity of <br />the park ecosystems, did further damage to <br />the landscapes by taking an industrial ap- <br />proach to maintenance. <br /> Change began in the late 1980s when a <br />grassroots group called the Louisville Friends <br />of Olmsted Parks issued a report on the con- <br />dition of the parks. The mayor responded by <br />establishing a task force that recommended <br />the creation of a nonprofit organization to <br />work with the parks department to make <br />major changes in the Olmsted system. In <br />1989, the nonprofit Louisville Olmsted Parks <br />Conservancy was created. <br /> The scale of Louisville's park reinvestment <br />effort is enormous. The conservancy's 1994 <br /> <br />and community volunteers to the best prac- <br />tices in the field. <br /> Implementing the master plan has me: <br />more than simply restoring Olmsted's <br />nal designs. The parks have suffered from <br />what Rademacher calls facility creep. "Over <br />the decades," she says, "there has been politi- <br />cal pressure to add facilities willy-nilly rather <br />than by design. Now we're making an effort <br />to accommodate the needs of current park <br />users without damaging the timeless quality <br />of the landscape." <br /> To this end, the master plan calls for phas- <br />ing out inappropriately placed recreational <br />facilities when they reach the end of their <br />useful lives. The old facilities are then relo- <br />cated to "active use zones" and replaced with <br /> <br />Photos ©2000 by T. Wath~n Quadrant <br /> <br /> convince park and recreation officials that <br /> there is something to gain from not building <br /> recreation faciliries. "Ir takes courage for a <br /> park administrator to choose not to clutter Up <br /> free space and just allow people to just sir and <br /> relax," she says. <br /> For decades, says Rademacher, Louisville's <br />cash-strapped and recreation-oriented admin- <br />istrations made maintenance of the city's his- <br />toric system of Olmsted parks and boulevards <br />a low priority. Playgrounds, ball fields, and <br />basketball and tennis courts were added with <br />little regard to how they would fit into the <br />landscape. Damage from years of wind and <br />ice storms was ignored. Dead and diseased <br />-lb~s and trees were not replaced, and inva- <br /> <br />master plan, developed after several years of <br />public involvement, recommended $55 mil- <br />lion in improvements. Since the plan's adop- <br />tion by the city council, the conservancy and <br />Metro Parks (the city's parks agency) have <br />restored historic woodland, s, vistas, and park- <br />ways; repaired and constructed 12 miles of <br />park roads and paved paths and 10 miles of <br />hiking and bridle trails; and planted more <br />than 1,500 trees and 15,000 plants. The part- <br />nership also has added new sports facilities, <br />shelters, restrooms, parking, and playgrounds. <br /> Throughout the process, says Rademacher, <br />the conservancy has stressed quality design <br />and good landscape management and main- <br />tenance,.often introducing maintenance staff <br /> <br />facilities that are sensitively integrated into <br />the park. <br /> Sometimes restoration means raking <br />Olmsted's work to the next level. The park <br />designer was a great innovator, says <br />Rademacher. "He loved to experiment with <br />new things. The last thing he would want us <br />to do is put his landscapes under glass. Our <br />goal is to restore and rehabilitate as Olmsted <br />might do it today." <br /> An example is Summit Field, a 1: <br />scape in Iroquois Park. The conservancy has <br />restored the landscape as a functional ecosys- <br />tem by installing a drainage system and add- <br />ing wetlands. "If Olmsted were alive today <br />and had our understanding of local soils and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.