Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR SICETCH PLA~ R_EVIXW OF thI~'_'_'_glt 'PA.R~; <br /> · - '" .CASE OF DALE WIR.Z <br /> ..... By: Community Development'Director Sylvia Froli'k <br /> <br /> Background: <br /> <br /> Dale W'u-z has ,applied for a sketch plan :review to subdi¼'de a ~ortion of his 37 acre <br /> 'homestead and nursery located on the east 'side of T.H. ~g4.7, across the highway 'from Fox <br /> R/dge at about the'i71;! grid 1/ne. The following kerns are enclosed: <br /> <br /> ' . a) Sit~ [ocation map : <br /> '.b) '..Proposed sketch.pian . ' <br /> c) City Staff'Review Letter dated. January 30, ~00'3 <br /> d) Draft Pl~nn.ing Commission meeting m~'nu~es dated Fet2ruary 6, 2003 . <br /> e) Letter from DNK dated February-24, 2005 <br /> f) .Cop); of City of Dayton Ordinance #2000-9- - <br /> <br /> Observations: - ' <br /> <br /> 'The property is zoned for'~ingle family-residential uses .and it is .'in-the Rural Developing <br /> -District for which there [sa minimum lot size of 2.5' acres. Mr. Wirz-is proposing to <br /> subdivide the. eastern portion, of-his .proPerty into 16 urban-s/zed lots (10,800. square foot <br /> minimum) .that would be served by a communal septic system and well until.sankary sewer <br /> and municipal water are available to the site. ' .' · - . · :- <br /> <br />. Mr.'Wirz' concept is to cluster the number Of un/ts that would be allowed w/th the 2.5' acre <br />standard .by reducing the she of the lots .to urban standards 'and congregating them. in one <br />...small area Of the property. Services would be provided w/th communkl systems u.util city. <br />sewe~ and Water are available to the site. In the..interim, Mr. :WYu---z would be able to realize a <br /> -return on his.property equal' to whaf he would ga/ri, if he subdivided, into 2.5 acre lots, and at'.' <br /> the same time ma~tain some open space in which to continue his agricultural' uses.. .When <br /> Cirylsewer a.uc[ water did become aval-lable to the site, his 'intent WOuld .be to connect the' <br /> existing ·homes to the services and .development the remainder of this 'propertY to .its ultimate <br /> <br /> Under'th~ 2.5' acre standard; a total.of 15'iots.would be allowed'on.the property, in'eluding'the.':.-.. <br /> existLug homeSXead. Mr: .Wi.rz is currently proposing: 17 lots, including the 'homestead. The- .. <br /> etknina~on-of.two, lots is required, regardless, if it-is'.a .straight 2.5 acre subdivision or a -. ' <br /> cluster de..vel0Pment. .. '" <br /> <br />In 0~der for the City to be able to. consider the proposed 'cluster".development, the.d'evetoper <br />would' either have to rezone the property to planned 'Unit' Development ('PUD) or request.an <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Plan mad the Zoning Ordinances to establish 'some <br />..gu/de[ines for cluster development. [n review/rig the sketch plan, Mr. Wirz' plan does not <br />appear to meet' the criteria for a PUD, especially the 20%. public or 50% pr/~,ate permanent <br /> <br /> <br />