Laserfiche WebLink
suojec~ to ail of the provisions o£that prograrn~ including reducing the discharge of <br />pollutants to the "maximum extent practicable" (MEP) through construction site runoff <br />control. Any construction on the site will also be permitted through M_PCA's NPDES <br />general construction permit process. <br /> <br />Prior to any e-at,j2 moving in the south east corner of the site, Burlin~on Northern Santa <br />Fe Railroad should be contacted in regards to arsenic contaminated soils. A more <br />detailed description of contamination and contact information is included in Item 20. <br /> <br />Elements of erosion protection w/ll include: phased construction with rrfinimized periods <br />of bare soil exposure, rapid re-vegetation, slope/~ade stabil/zation, use of mutch amd <br />fabric on exposed soils, temporary and permanent (if needed) sediment basins, properly <br />installed and maintained silt fencing, and adoption of a regular maintenance and- <br />inspection schedule. <br /> <br />Item 17 Miti~a.tion element.' The conversion of a~ricultural land to urban land <br />ultimately increases the remount and rate of runoff leaving the land. Minimizing the <br />impact of that increased runoff is the objective of this mitigation plan. <br /> <br />It must be stressed that this portion of Ramsey does not have a natural outlet to the <br />Mississippi River. The preliminary drainage system described within th/s AUAR <br />assumes an outlet that takes advantage of publicly-owned, County land that extends from <br />Hi~nway 10 to the lV£ississippi River south of the RTC site. Preliminary discussions with- <br />the County on the use of this land have occurred, but resolution has not been agreed <br />upon. Advantages of using this land extend beyond the RTC site, to the entire sub- <br />watershed, including the eventual upgrade of Highway .10, which will also need a Kiver <br />outlet. If permission cannot be obtained from the County to use its land, an.outlet option <br />will need to be pursued to the southeast, along Highway I0. The smail amount of water <br />that now leaves the site, runs southeast along the highway, but infiltrates w/thin a short <br />distance. <br /> <br />Mitigation Approach <br /> <br />The quantity, and quality approach laid-out earlier in this section describes an approach <br />driven by the need to comply with runoffcontro! rules of the LRRWMO and water <br />quality requirements that are described in the next section. The runoff management <br />system proposed in Figure t7.2 is done in a preliminary Sense to allow the City and the <br />developer to proceed with some knowledge of what desig"n specifics will be needed. The <br />City will assure that the developer(s)'will design and build the final drainage and runoff <br />management system within this overall framework, in compliance with the mandates of <br />the LRRWMO. <br /> <br />/mptementation of n~MPs in Preliminary Design <br /> <br />A system of BMPs can be initially proposed to meet the needs identified In the Item 12 <br />and 17 discussions. The first aspect of this design is the handling of the large-scale (1 <br /> <br />2O <br /> <br />D-11- <br /> <br /> <br />