Laserfiche WebLink
site. Excess volumes of surface water runoff will be pre-n-eared before allowed to drain <br />from ac CenTer or its nearby/adjacent runoff t~eatment system. <br /> <br />Because the R. amsey Town Center will not have any heavy industrial uses, it is not <br />expected that the provisions of the Phase II NPDES progrmm dealing with Industrial <br />Activity will apply. However, if development conditions change before the site is finally <br />built-out, and heavier industry is allowed on the site, these provisions could apply. <br />Although there is no intent for heavy [ndusn7 to occur in the Center, the Cffy wilI <br />monitor the permit requLrements relative to land uses under which the permit conditions <br />apply, and [mplement a ¢on~o[ pro.mm if ever needed. <br /> <br />Relation&hip to Missi~;i, vpi ~iver TMDL <br /> <br />One water quadity element of note in the mitigation plan is tile need to reduce the <br />negative impact of a discharge to an ,impaired water" under t/~e Total Maximum Daily <br />Load (TMDL) program...The Mississippi R.iver thraugh the City of Ramsey has been <br />listed on the MPCA recommended "303d" list as impaired relative to fecal coliform, PCB <br />and mercury. The PCB and mercury programs are regional in scale and are the subject of <br />regional MPCA and USEPA remediation prog-rams. The discharge of storm water high <br />in fecal coliform, however, is someth/ng that the City wLll need to address, The <br />implementation of nonpoint source pollution control B1V~s does not necessarily assure <br />the reduction of fecal coliform. The process for setting a TM:DL includes the 2'fitiation of <br />a formal study that results in recommendations for control of the pollutant causing the <br />impaLr'ment. MPCA has not yet begun th/s study for the impaired Mississippi River <br />re.qch; however, once this study begins (currently scheduled for 2004-2006), the City w/Il <br />cooperate to the best of its ability with the MPCA to reduce the input of fecal coliform to <br />the River. <br /> <br />Item 18 M~ti~ntion element. Both the wastewater flows and the projected loadings from <br />the RTC development can be effectively transported and treated by the MCES system. In <br />addition, future development and resulting flows are within the range of those estimated <br />in the City's 2001 Comprehensive Plan, as amended in 2002. Therefore, it does not' <br />appear that there is any cause for specific remediation actions. A 30-inch sewer main is <br />recommended to serve the RTC. <br /> <br />A~ noted earlier, it will be necessary for the City to update its Comprehensive Sewer <br />Plan, following d/scussion w/th MCES on increased allocated capacity. In addkion, it <br />will be important to measure and test ~e wastewater flows from the new development on <br />a periodic basis. This will allow the City a_nd MCES officials to monitor the <br />characteristics of the wastewater generated by the development over time and to address <br />any future unforeseen changes. <br /> <br />Item 19 Miti~ntion Element. The high permeability of the soils at the Town Center are <br />ideal for the implementation of infiltration practices that will manage stormwater runoff, <br />provide flood control and recharge the water table aquifer. However, the high <br /> <br />24 D- <br /> <br /> <br />