Laserfiche WebLink
Anoka Electric, and Midwest Gas (now know as Centerpoint Energy). Within the electric <br />ordinance there is a fee provision in consideration of the rights granted to the electric distributors <br />under the ordinance. The Midwest Gas (Centerpoint Energy) ordinance is silent on a possible <br />franchise fee and a revised ordinance will be introduced to include language regarding franchise <br />fees. The gas ordinance wilt need to be adopted prior to the adoption of the franchise fee <br />ordinance. The City of Ramsey is proposing a franchise fee of 4.5 percent of gross revenues on <br />all users. At 4.5 percent, the City would receive approximately $525,000 in franchise fee <br />revenue per year. Franchise fee revenues would be used for the City's share of street <br />maintenance costs and the labor associated with the maintenance and repair of City streets. Staff <br />feels that using a percentage rate on all users would be more equitable than a flat rate for every <br />property in the City or a per-unit charge of energy used. It is anticipated that the average <br />homeowner may pay $80 per year for gas and electric franchise fees. The City of Ramsey is not <br />the only city looking to franchise fees as a possible revenue source. Several of the neighboring <br />communities have either inquired about, are in the process of, or have put in place, the adoption <br />of a franchise fee ordinance. Each of these cities is faced with the same dilemma: major (or <br />total) cuts in state aids and loss of levying power at the time of major growth within their <br />communities. Staff recommended that the Council schedule a public hearing to introduce <br />ordinances establishing franchise fees at the rate of 4.5 percent of total revenues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired as to what the total impact would be on an average household <br />with the City being able to levy back the 60 percent loss in Local Government Aid. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund replied that she did not have that information available. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if the City would be able to eliminate the franchise fee in the <br />future when the City has a better tax base. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund replied yes and explained that every year the Council is presented with the <br />rates and charges so the Council can amend it each year. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if there was a way to determine the tax impact on a property <br />owner. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied that the action before the Council was to schedule the public <br />hearing, but he agreed with putting together better figures for the Council to review the full <br />impact on the property owners. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he would like the information before they hold a public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen inquired if it was possible to delay the public hearing until after their <br />budget discussions in July. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied that staff has already made some budget assumptions for <br />2003, and that they would be collecting franchise fees in the fourth quarter of 2003. <br /> <br />City Council/May 27, 2003 <br />Page 15 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />