My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/23/95
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
05/23/95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2025 12:15:30 PM
Creation date
7/9/2003 10:03:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Finance Committee
Document Date
05/23/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
By: <br /> <br />WINDEMERE WOODS <br />Jessie Hart, Finance Officer <br /> <br />CASE # / <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The only persons impacted by this issue are A1 and Alice Koenig, principals of Windemere Woods <br />of Ramsey. A copy of this case has been forwarded to them accordingly and they have been <br />apprised of the date, time and location of this meeting. <br /> <br />Early in 1995, residents of Windemere Woods requested Council action regarding the property at <br />5860 - 141st Lane N.W. As a result, we wrote the attached correspondence. To date, the status of <br />the issue is that we have retained an escrow in the amount of $1,800 from A1 and Alice Koenig, the <br />developers of Windemere Woods, to provide for the completion of driveway paving at this <br />property, which they own, in conformance with the development agreement. <br /> <br />Also attached is a 1/19/95 memorandum from Tom Pertler, Assistant City Attorney, regarding the <br />issue of retainage of the driveway escrow. <br /> <br />Mr. Koenig has requested release of the escrow which he believes we retained inappropriately. <br />Further, he has requested that interest be paid on the escrow retainage. It has been the policy of the <br />City of Ramsey, since the adoption of Ordinance #84-13 in 1984, not to pay interest nor charge an <br />administrative fee to escrow accounts. <br /> <br />In response to Mr. Koenig's request for interest and in that our policy is not to pay interest, I have <br />surveyed surrounding and rapidly developing communities as to their policies regarding escrows <br />held by the City. The following is the result of that informal survey [several communities had not <br />responded as of the writing of this case, a summary of any additional responses will be provided at <br />the meeting]: <br /> <br />City of Anoka - The City of Anoka, as a policy, does not pay interest on escrow accounts unless it <br /> has been separately negotiated in a development agreement. <br /> <br />City of Andover - The City of Andover pays interest on escrow accounts utilizing a passbook rate <br /> method on a quarterly basis. <br /> <br />City of Coon Rapi~l$ - The City of Coon Rapids, as a policy, does not pay interest on escrow <br /> accounts unless the escrow is to guarantee special assessments. They do not apply a <br /> service charge on escrow accounts. <br /> <br />City of Eagan - The City of Eagan has included in each of their development agreements the <br /> following statement: "The City shall not be responsible for paying any interest on the <br /> account contemplated under this Agreement". The policy includes escrows not governed <br /> by development agreements. <br /> <br />City of Elk River - The City of Elk River, through an ordinance, does not pay interest nor charge <br /> an administrative fee on escrow accounts and is currently in the process of changing the <br /> ordinance to provide more authority in collecting developers escrow accounts. <br /> <br />City of Golden Valley - The City of Golden Valley does not have a policy but as a practice does not <br /> give interest on escrow accounts. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.