My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/25/95
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Road and Bridge Committee
>
Agendas
>
1995
>
04/25/95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2025 12:16:43 PM
Creation date
7/9/2003 11:28:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Road & Bridge Committee
Document Date
04/25/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BISON STREET PAVING <br />By: Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />I have been advised that a petition will be circulated for the paving of the portion of Bison <br />Street N.W., north of 171st Avenue. One of the first steps in initiating a public <br />improvement project is for the Council to certify that the proper percentages of parties have <br />signed the petition. Past history associated with previous feasibility studies for this project <br />suggest that several parcels, contiguous to the portion of Bison Street proposed for paving, <br />have had challenges to the issue of whether or not they had been benefitted. Attached is a <br />sketch from the last feasibility study illustrating the parcels in questions. <br /> <br />First, Parcel A has a residence which has access onto 173rd Avenue (C.R. #63). The <br />homestead is quite distant from Bison Street, approximately 250 feet, and would not be <br />likely to redirect its driveway onto Bison Street if it were paved. One past feasibility study <br />for this project proposed this parcel be considered benefitted and assessed one-half a share. <br />The most recent feasibility studies, performed in 1993, did not consider this parcel <br />benefitted. I spoke to the City Attorney regarding this issue. He reminded me that in <br />making a determination, Section 729 limits an assessment to the licensed value of the <br />property. Since it is unlikely that this property would increase in value by several thousand <br />dollars as a result of paving, this lot should not be considered benefitted. <br /> <br />Parcels 3 and 4 are owned by the same property owner and are both lots of record which <br />would be eligible for a building permit. In previous public hearings, the owner stated he <br />would combine the two lots into a single property if the project were to proceed. The issue <br />here is whether to consider these two parcels as one or two votes and assessments. <br /> <br />Parcels 5 and 6 are both parcels in the Dellwood Hills subdivision. The paving of Bison <br />Street was specifically addressed in the development agreement for Dellwood Hills as <br />follows: <br /> Bison Street N.W. Improvement. The City has determined that Bison <br /> Street Northwest, which is a street providing access to the Plat, needs to be <br /> improved, including bituminous surfacing. The City is considering this <br /> improvement as a special assessment project. The Developer agrees to <br /> make advance payment to the City in the amount of Nine thousand Four <br /> Hundred-Thirty-four and 00/I00 Dollars ($9,434.00) which is the City <br /> Engineer's estimate of the benefit Lots 1 and 9 of the Plat would receive <br /> from the improvement of Bison Street N.W. The City agrees that it will not <br /> further assess any of the lots in the Plat for the hard surface improvement of <br /> Bison Street N.W. The said $9,434.00 will be deposited with the City <br /> prior to recording of the final Plat. <br /> <br />I have spoken to the City Attorney regarding this situation and it is his opinion that, despite <br />the limitation on the financial responsibility of these two lots, they would be considered <br />benefitted parcels and therefore eligible to vote. <br /> <br />I felt it important to solicit input from the Council at an early stage. The last feasibility <br />study in 1993 underwent three revisions before it was finally adopted by the City Council. <br />As you may be aware, the final adopted feasibility study becomes the basis for the project <br />and its financing. I am attaching the last feasibility study considered for this project for <br />your information. Any suggestions for modifications would be welcome. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.