My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/21/1995 - Public Hearing
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1995
>
Minutes - Council - 03/21/1995 - Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:53:20 PM
Creation date
7/10/2003 9:27:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Public Hearing
Document Date
03/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
collector roadways to connect Ramsey with Andover and Elk River. There has been a number' of <br />discussions on whether to place a bridge corridor across the Mississippi River. The City Council <br />consensus was to show no bridge crossing in the area. That would be handled in the text of the <br />comprehensive plan amendment. One other item is major additions in land use - mixed density <br />residential. The intent is not to identify a residential use or density this maybe would include a <br />variety of your residential categories. The density could vary depending upon specific plans for <br />specific areas. <br /> <br />Bill Smith with Biko Associates presented the transportation plan. The primary focus is the <br />east/west collectors. Because of wetlands, Ramsey does not have continuity. We wanted to look <br />for linkages between Elk River to the west and Andover to the east and possibly to make a stronger <br />connection to Highway gl0 and Anoka to the south. With regard to the Highway gl0 corridor - <br />we were able to identify possible linkage on 173rd, west into Elk River and a connection on Jarvis <br />to the north. Elk River is interested in the linkage as well. Jarvis would become the joint <br />responsibility of the two cities. We looked at potential crossings of the Rum River to the east into <br />Andover. It would enable trips generated from the northeast area of Ramsey to come down and <br />cross the river and back up to a higher capacity street to get to Highway gl0 rather than Highway <br />#47 or County Road #5. One of the major concerns of the study is the condition of Highway #10. <br />There is in excess of 52 direct access points onto Highway gl0 from private properties. That's a <br />dangerous situation; it does not make sense to have that many accesses. There should be a route to <br />consolidate accesses. Another east/west route is the continuation of County Road gl 16. One <br />highway frontage road would be to continue McKinley Street on the north side of the railroad <br />tracks. Access to the south across the railroad tracks immediately on the south side of that would <br />be a two-lane road. This could eliminate the need for direct accesses onto Highway gl0. We <br />could continue it along just west of Sunfish Lake Boulevard and up to Ramsey Boulevard and one <br />driveway west to Armstrong to service other properties. That is an area where an at-grade crossing <br />currently provides access to Highway gl0 which is not a good connection. Bringing Highway <br />#47 down and around wetland and making a more logical connection to Thurston would eliminate <br />the need for these hairpin turns. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin asked that the residents limit comment to three to five minutes due to the number of <br />people wishing to speak. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Wayne Johnson of Wayne L. Johnson in Anoka, inquired if, on Highway #47, that would be <br />diverted to the west, north of County Road #116. Mr. Smith replied yes, there is an existing <br />wetland on the west side of Highway #47 fight now; we would want to skirt along that and make a <br />nice transition onto Thurston. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson inquired if this is years away. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith replied that this would involve state funding and negotiations with the City of Anoka. <br />He then elaborated on the proposed trail plan. He stated this was done with a lot of input from <br />Ramsey's Park and Recreation Commission. This identifies on-road A trail - a trail that is built <br />within the right-of-way of the roadway. This takes advantage of the shoulder - 8 to 10 feet wide <br />for bicycle and recreational use. On-road B trail is also on the roadway right-of-way but the trail is <br />separated from the road by a grassy boulevard. This could be the ditch in the rural area and in the <br />urban area it could be the space that' separates the sidewalk from the road. Off-road trails are not in <br />the roadway right-of-way; the road may be several feet away. The width is 10 feet for a two-way <br />bicycle trail. We have trees and shrubbery shown in the typical section and a five foot walking <br />path. You have the Trott Brook trail - a 200 foot wide swamp in some areas. There is no <br />guarantee it would be 200 feet wide in the whole area. Snowmobile usc would be allowed. <br />Across Trunk Highway #47 and over to Rum River Park there is a multi-use trail. No <br /> <br />Public Hearing/City Council/March 21, 1995 <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.