My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/25/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1995
>
Minutes - Council - 04/25/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:54:18 PM
Creation date
7/10/2003 9:37:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/25/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and trail corridor should be removed from the map. Instead, narrative should be added to <br />the comprehensive plan amendment directing that a corridor be identified in concert with the <br />City of Andover somewhere along the Rum River. A Rum River bridge corridor would be <br />moot if traffic congestion from T.H. #47 were redirected to 7th Avenue. Another comment <br />made at the public hearing was that the thoroughfare plan needs to address some relief for <br />the congestion on Highway #47. Staff is not suggesting any changes. The County Road <br />#116 and T.H. #47 intersection will be upgraded by MnDOT/Anoka County within the <br />1995/1996 time frame. The City has budgeted for a corridor study for 1995 and set aside <br />$300,000 in the 1998 CIP for corridor improvements. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin added that the City of Anoka is involved in a similar traffic study and he <br />inquired of Mr. Weaver where his City was at with regard to that. <br /> <br />John Weaver, Councilmember for the City of Anoka, stated that Anoka had a rather <br />extensive meeting about a week ago. MnDOT's funding will not permit changes at Main <br />Street and Ferry Street until 1999. They have indicated that this project is at the top of the <br />list for the 5-year plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder commented that just because a project is at the top of the priority list doesn't <br />mean funding will be received. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin stated that alternatives will have to be discussed. <br /> <br />Mr. Weaver stated that they have four alternatives, but no positive assurance they will <br />receive funding. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman felt that, with regard to Highway #47, the year 1998 seems to <br />be too distant. We need to get some controlled intersections. We need to get some <br />alternative funding. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer agreed that this project better get moved ahead. <br /> <br />With regard to reconsidering the proposal to plan for a Rum River bridge crossing corridor <br />through the Boy Scout Camp, Councilmember Beyer stated that Staff suggested that come <br />off; however, it is still shown on the map. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that Staff did not want to presume that changes made have received <br />the "nod" from Council. The map is left as is until Council gives the word. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin added that the lines will be reviewed for wetlands, etc. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder commented that the wetlands had just been reviewed. <br /> <br />Ben Deemer, 14501 Sunfish Lake BOulevard N.W., Ramsey, disseminated a typed <br />response to the items being discussed. He commented as follows: With regard to Staff's <br />response to the opposition to the off-road trail system, he didn't understand where the <br />figures 16,000 and 100 came from. He didn't feel the numbers were realistic or relevant to <br />the issue. A person on horseback may travel several miles further than a person out for a <br />casual stroll, therefore, in his opinion, the horse trail should be farther. He added "See <br />how you can bend the issue with statistics and numbers". With regard to the opposition to <br />a trail around Sunfish Lake, Mr. Deemer dissected Staff's response by stating that "Trail <br />corridors protect and reduce these sensitive areas from the impacts of development" is poor <br />grammar and can be made into two sentences which would not change the meaning as <br />stated. For example, "Trail corridors protect these sensitive areas from the impacts of <br /> <br />City Council/April 25, 1995 <br /> Page 7 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.