Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Dee~ suggested drafting Ramsey's changes, and he inquired if there was a <br />consensus inform the County that the City of Ramsey finds a 50-foot setback excessive. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski explained that the County has already conceded that and that's why they changed <br />it. He reported that the County wants what they have for right-of-way, and then for the City of <br />Ramsey to enforce its local zoning requirements. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to direct Staff to <br />prepare an ordinance change modifying thoroughfare setbacks along county roads to be 60 feet <br />from the centerline of the existing right-of-way plus the City's local applicable setback. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Commissioner Hendriksen stated that depending on the positioning of the <br />home, the local applicable setback could be 35 to 40 feet if it is a front yard and 5 to 20 feet, which <br />is not equitable, if it is a side or rear yard. Mayor Hardin suggested the Planning Commission <br />could address an equitable, uniform local structure setback from county roads at one of their <br />meetings. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer, and Zimmerman, <br />Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, Hendriksen,, Terry, and Thom& Voting No: None. Absent: <br />Councilmember Beahen and Commissioners Holland and LaDue. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to direct Staff and the <br />Planning Commission to deal with the issue of an equitable, uniform local structure setback from <br />county roads and return to City Council with a recommendation. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Commissioner Deemer advised that the Planning Commission will be dealing <br />with another section of Chapter 9 at their regular Planning Commission meeting to be held <br />following this meeting, and he suggested that maybe the Planning Commission should take a look <br />at all of Chapter 9 and get it ready for approval of the City Council. Ms. Frolik reported that City <br />Attorney Bill Goodrich and Jim Gromberg (Economic Development Coordinator) are working on <br />recodifying all of Chapter 9. Councflmember Beyer stated she didn't think Mr. Gromberg should <br />be working on this, it is the mandate of the Planning Commission. Councilmember Peterson <br />advised that if the Planning Commission determines the need for major revisions, they should <br />return to City Council for discussion before proceeding. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer, and Zimmerman, <br />Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, Hendriksen,, Terry, and Thomd. Voting No: None. Absent: <br />Councilmember Beahen and Commissioners Holland and LaDue. <br /> <br />COUNCIL/COMMISSION INPUT <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Coucilmember Beyer to adjourn the meeting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmcmbers Peterson, Beyer and Zimmerman, <br />Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, Hendriksen, Terry, and Thomd. Voting No: None. Absent: <br />Councilmember Beahen and Commissioners Holland and LaDue. <br /> <br />City Council. Planning Commission/November 9, 1995 <br /> Page 4 of $ <br /> <br /> <br />