My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 11/29/1995 - Budget Public Hearing
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1995
>
Minutes - Council - 11/29/1995 - Budget Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 4:04:32 PM
Creation date
7/10/2003 10:47:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Budget Public Hearing
Document Date
11/29/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
plow the next day and scrape all the sand into the ditch. He felt that second track could <br />have been eliminated and there probably is not a need for another maintenance worker. He <br />added that his tax increase is more than he can afford. <br /> <br />Ed Brun, 16611 Yttrium Street NW, Ramsey, felt that if the government is making an <br />effort to reduce its spending, his taxes should not have increased 22.5%. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin called his attention to the breakdown of the taxes and what the City's actual <br />portion is. <br /> <br />Ms. Hart explained that increases are needed to provide services and with more residents <br />comes the need for more services. New properties come on line and we do not collect full <br />taxes from these properties for about two years. Where Ramsey is, tax wise and employee <br />per capita wise, in comparison to other cities was noted. <br /> <br />Marcia, 14143 Barium Street NW, Ramsey, stated that her taxes increased 111.2% and her <br />property value only went up about 3%. <br /> <br />Ms. Hart explained that the increase is that high because of value increases - they are not <br />proportionate. If there were no value increases - the bottom line increase would have been <br />1.5%. Our baseline increase of 3.43% does not impute any increases in value. <br /> <br />John Karst, 17650 Cobalt Street NW, Ramsey, asked why the City cannot practice a little <br />fiscal restraint. We are overspending - our police department is double the cost of what <br />Andover's is. We have 10 to 15 police officers and we should be able to get by with half <br />that. We are buying new police cars all the time and they should be lasting 8 to 10 years <br />instead. With regard to blacktopping roads - crushed rock was used and he felt his street <br />was in worse condition after it was topped. Mr. Karst continued that the playground in his <br />neighborhood was not mowed in over a year. The park across the road from 179th and <br />County Road 7 was closed for over a year - the gate was padlocked and chained. We are <br />charged $3 every couple months for recycling and the company that picks it up is making a <br />profit on it. The City of Andover is not charging anything for their recycling. He referred <br />to an article he read in the Readers Digest, that claimed that recycling companies pick up the <br />recycling and then deposits it in the garbage/landfills anyway. Companies are making <br />profit on paper recycling as well as the tin and aluminum. They should be paying us to <br />recycle. Last year at this meeting, one of our lady Councilmembers said to jack up the levy <br />because no one complained. He stated he was glad the other Councilmembers were against <br />that action and he hopes they stick to that again. We are getting more businesses in <br />Ramsey - we should notice an increase in the tax bases. The businesses and new <br />homeowners should be charged more taxes - they should be paying their proportionate <br />share. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin stated that the City has made an effort to try to a~act new businesses to the <br />City and we have experienced some success in that area. The problem is, it takes time to <br />build buildings and get the tax bases flowing in. He added that services have to be <br />provided and that they have to be increased due to growth in the City. The Police <br />Department is the biggest part of the budget but these are choices we have to make and it <br />helps to get input to make the decision together. <br /> <br />City Administrator Schroeder stated that with regard to Police staffing - there are 15 people <br />in the Department - two of which are clerical. There are 17,000 people in Ramsey and if <br />you compare it to any other city on a population basis, you would find Ramsey is <br />significantly below normal staffing ranges. The reason we can get by on a somewhat <br />lower number of police officers is because we are not a large retail community. The Star <br /> <br />Budget Public Hearing/City Council/November 29, 1995 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.