Laserfiche WebLink
Also repeating Figure 6, north of the CR 116 areas, Single Family Residential designation <br />begins at the golf course and continues east along the north side of 149th Ave. NE to the <br />landfill site. Between 149th and CR 116, a combination of Medium and High Density <br />Residerttial is proposed. The landfill area is designated Open Space. A Park would be <br />developed between this Open Space area and 153rd Ave. NW. On the south of the Open <br />Space area is designated Industrial. <br /> <br />South of Hwy. 10, land uses are identical to Figure 6 from Mississippi West Park and to <br />the east, with an area east of Ramsey Blvd. providing for High Density Residential. However, <br />some land uses that differ from Figure 6 are shown. Next to the park, Medium Density <br />Residential replaces Commercial (retail) which in turn replaces some Single Family <br />Residential land along the highway. <br /> <br />Business Warehouse uses are shown west of the bridge road, again to take advantage of <br />the high visibility of the location at the interchange of two major traffic routes. The south <br />access road here is moved away from the highway. This allows for a larger area for larger <br />commercial developments. This road and the residential collector are shown passing <br />under the bridge road. Single Family Residential is shown for the remainder of the area <br />south of Hwy. 10. <br /> <br />Attached to this report is a chart comparing the scenarios shown in Figures 4 - 7 with the <br />existing situation (Attachment A). The charts serve two purposes. One, the quantity of <br />land in each of the different land use categories is listed. Two, the acreages in each <br />alternative can be compared to the existing zoning scheme and to other alternatives. It <br />should be noted that the comparison covers only the Hwy. 10 study area. A similar <br />analysis that includes the entire city is recommended as.part of the comprehensive plan <br />amendment work. <br /> <br />Figure 7A <br /> <br />This alternative, a variation of Figure 7, evolved from discussion between staff and the <br />consultants. In general, alternative 7A utilizes a roadway system similar to the one <br />approved by the Planning' Commission and shown in Figure 7. There are two ma/n <br />differences between tkis figure and the others. First, the land uses are separated into only two <br />types: residential and nonresidential. Second, it covers the entire city rather than individual <br />sebwnents. More focused attention has been devoted to the alignment of specific roads and the <br />amount of residential and nonresidential land. For s!mplicity, only the Hwy. 10 corridor land <br />uses are identified in this report. '~' <br /> <br /> <br />