My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
09/07/94 Staff Budget
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Minutes
>
1990's
>
1994
>
09/07/94 Staff Budget
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2025 3:43:41 PM
Creation date
7/15/2003 2:56:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Finance Committee Staff Budget
Document Date
09/07/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer Jankowsld stated Ramsey is one of the lower taxed municipalities and 8% <br />seems reasonable. <br /> <br />Ms. McAloney stated that we should recommend 8% only if we think we need an 8% <br />increase. <br /> <br />Mr. Gustafson agreed with 8%. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator C-romberg stated he agrees with Kay. What we think <br />it should be, put it there - if we need something - we will have to cut something else. <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated she can see picking a number (8%) if you are building <br />in the cushion - but it's human instinct - if we have it, we spend it. She stated she wants a <br />reason for the spending. <br /> <br />Mr. Boos stated he would second Kay's motion. The socially responsible thing would be <br />to limit public spending - not raise taxes. <br /> <br />Ms. Hart stated we need a minimum of 4.5% to cover the new officer's wages. We have <br />given Council a list. I feel it's necessary to give them that leeway. We are comfortable <br />with what we are presenting. I am comfortable with an 8% increase. I think the resolution <br />should be adopted at a maximum of 8% increase. She stated page 20 of the packet of <br />information is the list. ff they pass an 8% increase, it would give us room to negotiate the <br />budget. Eight percent gets the City another $33,000. If Council feels they want to add <br />these items back in, this shows them a way to do that. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik suggested just adding it back in because Council will say we will find some <br />way to use it. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder stated his recommendation is the 4.5% ultimately. The new officer is <br />creating a 4.5% increase and it should be recognized. If I was running for Council, I <br />would approve of 4.5%. If I am not sure, I would put something a little higher. Eight <br />percent in an election year is high. <br /> <br />A Staff member inquired if Council could say something different and then Staff could <br />come back. <br /> <br />Ms. Hart stated the amount has to be certified to the County. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that Council could change the number to say 5%. <br /> <br />Ms. Hart stated that the Charter requires this to be done at the first meeting in September. <br />The City Administrator has to present a proposed balanced budget. <br /> <br />Ms. McAloney asked what if they say we want the officer but we do not want an increase. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that Staff would have to cut $43,000 out of its proposed budget. We <br />have a lot of opportunities to cut $43,000 from the budget. We could actually cut <br />$200,000 out of this budget - is it a good idea - probably not. <br /> <br />Ms. Hart stated she agrees with the 4.5% but thinks we need the "cushion" there. She felt <br />Council's goal is to have the tax levy at or below the mean. We are there. Their other <br />objective is to provide adequate levels of services. There are varying opinions on the <br />Council as individuals, but as a group, she felt they believe the City is providing an <br /> <br />Staff Budget Meeting/September 7, 1994 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.