Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jankowski continued that to be able to meet this letting date, the City would need to <br />have plans for the signalization prepared at an estimated cost of $12,000. To expedite the <br />project would also require the City to fund a $22,500 expenditure in 1995, which hasn't <br />been included in the budget. A funding source will need to be identified if this project is to <br />be expedited. <br /> <br />Mayor C. dlbertson felt that six months was not too long to wait for the signalization. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman felt that the expedition of the project is too costly for just six <br />months. He inquired how certain Mr. Jankowski was that it would actually happen in <br />1996. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski stated that it is currently budgeted; however, budgets can change. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that the only concern he has is to make certain that it <br />happens in 1996. If the time comes and the Federal aid does not come through, he felt the <br />City had to do something about it then. <br /> <br />The Road and Bridge Committee directed Mr. Jankowski to check on the funding and the <br />history of program delay. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Committee was to recommend that the signalization be a 1996 project <br />with the incumbent $10,500 required expense. <br /> <br />City Administrator Schroeder felt that as long as time remained, the Committee should <br />probably discuss Case <br /> <br />Case <br /> <br />Consideration of Modifying Assessment Procedures Applicable <br />to the Annual Street Maintenance Program <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated he has a proposed policy of assessments relating to the <br />street maintenance program. He summarized the proposed policy which talks about the <br />City's participation and share, the projects aggregated by subdivision, project shares, <br />comer lots and double frontage lots, and MSA roadways and unusual projects. This policy <br />will be forwarded to Council for discussion. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Consensus of the Committee was to adjourn the meeting. <br /> <br />The Road .and Bridge Committee meeting adjourned at 6:07 p.m. <br /> <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br />(~/~tecormng, ~eeretary <br /> <br />St~ven Jar/fi. 9 <br />City Engi/ie[q <br /> <br />Road and Bridge Committee/December 13, 1994 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />