Laserfiche WebLink
Council Business <br /> <br />Mayor Gilbertson called the regular City Council meeting back to order at 7:07 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hardin and seconded by Councilmember Peterson to approve, <br />contingent upon City Attorney review, the VFW Post #1043 non-intoxicating malt liquor <br />license application for the property located at 9539 Highway #10 N.W. <br /> <br />Motion carried, Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Hardin, Peterson, Beyer <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Request for Proposals for Design/Construction Engineering <br />and Wetland Delineation for 153rd Avenue N.W./155th Avenue <br />N.W. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that this is a step in the continuing process the City has <br />been studying since September 1991 to complete an east/west collector street across the <br />City of Ramsey. This portion of the roadway is between Variolite Street N.W. and 155th <br />Avenue N.W., and 153rd Avenue N.W. and Armstrong Boulevard N.W. He stated it is <br />evident that the City had intended to utilize 153/155 as a collector street by requiring <br />Whispering Pines and Whispering Pines 2nd Addition to have the potential for eliminating <br />direct access to 153rd Avenue N.W. This occurred 22 years ago. Mr. Jankowski reported <br />that several meetings have been held regarding this last segment of the street. A list has <br />been developed of people interested in this project and they have been made aware of this <br />meeting. A considerable amount of public input has been provided on this project. <br />Following a conceptual plan for the roadway developed by City Staff, an Environmental <br />Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared since it was anticipated the roadway would <br />impact at least a portion of Wetland #111P, which is a DNR protected wetland. City <br />Council reviewed the EAW and issued a finding of no significant impact. The engineering <br />firm of RLK Associates detailed an alignment which was most consistent with that <br />reflecting Staff's conceptual plan which was the basis for the EAW. This alignment, <br />identified as Alternative A, intersects at the current intersection with 153rd Avenue N.W. <br />and Armstrong Boulevard N.W. at a right angle and tums northward using a 40 mile per <br />hour design speed curve. This alignment resulted in impacting approximately three acres of <br />wetland. Mr. Jankowski stated that, given citizen concerns, the consultant was directed to <br />search for alternatives which would minimize the wetland impact. They came up with <br />Alternative B which reduced the wetland impact to less than two-tenths of an acre. This <br />alternative required skewing the angle of intersection with Armstrong Boulevard N.W. by <br />15° from perpendicular, reducing the curve design speeds to 35 miles per hour, and <br />building a retaining wall to avoid all but a small portion of the wetland. A slight revision of <br />Alternative B resulted in the recommended Alternative C which completely avoids any <br />impact on the wetland. This would be done by moving back the beginning of the skew <br />approach to Armstrong Boulevard N.W. to the west for a distance of approximately 200 <br />feet. The avoidance of any impact to the wetland is an issue which was strongly supported <br />by the citizens providing input on this project. Mr. Jankowski stated that Staff is pleased to <br />be able to meet the goal of no impact to the wetland. Mr. Jankowski stated that another <br />concern was the impact of drainage from this roadway on Wetland #111 P, which is a <br />landlocked water body. Run-off is proposed to be collected in two separate storm sewer <br />systems, each one outletting into sedimentation basins located south of 153rd Avenue <br />N.W. These basins would provide treatment to enhance water quality prior to discharge <br />into the wetland. Another concern expressed was for the Blandings Turtle. DNR <br />recommended that a chain link fence be installed to prevent turtles from crossing the <br />roadway. Staff's position is that the fence would be a high maintenance, poor aesthetic <br />solution. He proposed that a short retaining wall be constructed along the area where the <br /> <br />City Council/July 26, 1994 <br /> Page 5 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />