My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/19/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
1998 - 1999
>
1999
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/19/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:09:49 PM
Creation date
7/16/2003 2:24:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
01/19/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
scheduling in I998 and earlier, the number of total candidate projects for 1999 has an estimated <br />cost of $785,000. The list of candidate projects are being reviewed by the street superintendent <br />and his staff and a schedule of selected projects and deferred projects will be presented at the <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Policies and Futures Programs <br /> <br />The above discussion leads into the consideration for modifying the current policies. A_n <br />evaluation of the City's pavement data base confirms that the level of funding needs to be <br />increased substantially over that allocated in past years programs if the maintenance frequency <br />goals are to be achieved. Attached is a summary of the street maintenance programs conducted <br />since 1992. The significant increase in the program cost in the 1998 program resulted from the <br />overlaying of approximately four miles of state aid roadway utilizing MSA funds. The need for <br />greater amounts of future funding stems from the fact that the City pavements are aging and a <br />larger percentage require more expensive overlays. An estimate of the cost of preventive <br />maintenance was made utilizing was made utilizing three separate methods leads staff to <br />conclude an annual budget of $500,000 be required in the next five years. <br /> <br />Many of the public comments regarding this program have been of a similar nature over the <br />years. A few of the comments have had to do with the quality or necessity of the work which <br />was performed. However, the majority of the comments were directed at the method of financing <br />this program. With increasing the size of the program cost, it should be anticipated that there <br />would be an increase in the number of such comments. Attached is a table showing the average <br />and range of assessments associated with the street maintenance program since 1992. <br /> <br />The following are some considerations for possibly modifying the assessment procedures. <br /> <br />(a) <br /> <br />Elimination of Assessments. Many of the comments received at assessment hearings <br />suggested that City general tax revenue should fund these types of maintenance projects. <br />While many past Councilmembers agreed with this sentiment, the financial challenges of <br />raising an additional $365,000 annually makes eliminating the entire assessment highly <br />unlikely. This assumes the annual program budget would be raised to $500,000, when <br />we currently budget $135,000. However, it might be possible to eliminate or phase out <br />the assessments for sealcoating work. These projects represent smaller assessments, and <br />a growing number of projects will include overlays. <br /> <br />(b) <br /> <br />Assessments on MSA Streets. There will be no projects involving MSA streets on the <br />1999 program. Therefore, this may be a good time to address this issue which has <br />generated a considerable amount of discussion in the past. The actual amount of revenue <br />generated from assessment 0fproperties fronting on MSA streets is relatively small. The <br />issue is basically one of fairness. If a resident on a non-MSA street is assessed, should a <br />resident on an MSA street be exempt from assessment for a similar improvement. <br />Arguments for eliminating the assessment include the fact that the City receives MSA <br />funds from the state for such projects. However, the City received less than five percent <br />annually of the money it needs to bring the City's MSA system up to MSA standards. In <br />short, the amount of money received falls far short of its programmed needs. The second <br /> <br />@shared/pwcommit/1999/january/streetma <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.