Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carri~l. Voting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Board Members Terry, Bawden, Deemer, <br />Holland, LaDue and Thom& Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Deemer and seconded by Board Member Terry to delete #4 because it <br />does not applY. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Board Member Deemer stated this is not a double frontage lot because the lot <br />does not have 200 feet on two streets. Zoning Administrator Frolik stated that there is not 200 feet <br />lot width but them is frontage. <br /> <br />Motion failed. Voting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Board Member Deemer and Terry. Voting <br />No: Board Members Bawden, Holland, LaDue and Thom& <br /> <br />Motion by Bmrd Member Deemer and seconded by Board Member Terry to amend g6 to delete the <br />wording "but access is obstructed by a county ditch." <br /> <br />Amendment by Board Member Bawden and seconded by Board Member Holland to change the <br />wording to read "... but access on the proposed building site is obstructed by a county ditch..." <br /> <br />Amendment carried. Voting Yes: Board Members Bawden, Holland, LaDue, Terry and Thomd. <br />Voting No: (2hairperson Hendriksen and Board Member Deemer. <br /> <br />Motion carri~:l. Voting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Board Members Deemer, Terry, Bawden, <br />Holland, I.aDue and Thomd. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Hendriksen and seconded by Board Member Deemer to add #6A to read <br />"There are many building sites suitable on this parcel that do not require access across a county <br />ditch." <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Board Members Deemer, Bawden, <br />Holland, Terry and Thomd. Voting No: Board Member LaDue. <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Terry and seconded by Board Member Deemer to delete #7 because it is <br />irrelevant. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Board Members Terry, Deemer, and <br />Thomd. Voting No: Board Members Bawden, Holland and LaDue. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairl~son Hendriksen and seconded by Board Member Deemer to add a finding to <br />read "That a .n~p..msentative of the applicant stated at the public hearing, that the need for the variance <br />was econonue, tn nature because of the cost of extending and impromng Osmium Street in order to <br />provide the minimum legal frontage on a public road." <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Hendriksen, Deemer, Bawden, and Terry. Voting No: <br />Board Members I.aDue and Thom& Abstaining: Board Member Holland. <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Deemer and seconded by Chairperson Hendriksen to delete #8 because <br />them is no hm'dship. <br /> <br />Motion failed. Voting Yes: Board Member Deemer, Hendriksen, and Terry. Voting No: Board <br />Members Bawden, Holland, LaDue and Thomd. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/September 7, 1993 <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />