Agenda - Council - 11/27/2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

State law, requires the City to examine "...if the evidence presented by the petitioners, proposers, and other persons otherwise known to the RGU demonstrates that, because of the nature or location of the proposed project, the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects." The City Council is required to adopt findings of fact with regard to the factual and legal reasons for reaching its conclusion about whether or not an EAW will be needed. Staff Recommendation: Due to the nature of the surrounding land uses, (Critical River Corridor, Scenic and Wildlife Corridor, MNRRA, a national park, Mississippi West Regional Park) it can be assumed that there are significant environmental resources in close proximity to the site. However, it is unclear what these resources are and the effect that the proposed activities would have on the resources. Staff is requesting that the City Council consider enlisting the expertise of a consultant to conduct limited research with regard to the items listed in the petition, and ask them to bring forward a recommendation in memo format regarding the need to complete an EAW. - Funding Source: A determination will need to be made with regard to the funding source for the work associated with gathering evidence to make a decision on whether or not an EAW is needed. Typically, EAW documents are paid for by the applicant/developer. A general inquiry with Bolten and Menk Engineering and SRF Consulting and suggested that an environmental scan and professional recommendation would cost around $1,900.00 to 5,000.00 respectively. Council Motion: Motion to direct staff to engage the services of a consultant (at a cost not to exceed to put together a professional recommendation on whether or not a full EAW is warranted. Review Checklist: City Attorney Associate Planner City Administrator CC 11.29.07 —1.00—