My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/27/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 11/27/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:55:59 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:11:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/27/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Gould stated that the NRI could be used to help guide the City in its decision making about <br />development or land preservation. She stated that mapping shows sensitive resources and these <br />could be identified in an ordinance that is sensitive to development possibilities. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that there are parts of the NRI that he thinks are fabulous but parts <br />that he thinks may be kind of prickly when it starts talking about setbacks and wetland buffering. <br />He asked if this document was accepted by the City what would be the process for people to <br />appeal the setbacks. <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that he wanted to make it very clear that this <br />document is only an inventory of what is in the City. He stated that the buffers Councilmember <br />Elvig was referring to are part of the wetland inventory and this document, unless the City wants <br />it to, is not tied to any ordinance or setback. He stated that this is baseline information so the <br />City knows what it has and can be used as part of the comprehensive plan process. He stated that <br />this baseline information is something that the City Council has been asking for, for a long time. <br />He stated that Bonestroo and Associates did include some ideas of possible next steps and ideas <br />on how the City can preserve and enhance what it has, but for now this is informational only. He <br />stated that he views it as a valuable tool, not a roadmap. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that he understands the need for an inventory and advocated this, <br />but he always thought the inventory was the baseline for determining the quality of a property. <br />He stated that he feels this sets an ordinance that will determine setbacks based on the quality of <br />the property. <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that this is different from the wetland study that is already in <br />place. She stated that she sees this as a tool for staff to use when a plat is reviewed to see what <br />type of natural resources are in place that may be affected by development. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that he did not want to debate the reasons or benefits of the <br />document, but would like to make sure that there will be an appeal process for residents. <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that there is nothing to appeal because this, at this point, is just <br />an inventory of what the City has. <br />Councilmember Elvig clarified that this document has nothing to do with the wetland buffers. <br />Mayor Gamec reassured those present that the NRI is only a tool or planning document, not an <br />ordinance. <br />2) Anoka County Request for Approval of Sunfish Lake Boulevard Design <br />Mayor Gamec announced that County Commissioner Dennis Berg was present to answer <br />questions about the plan for the suggested Sunfish Lake Boulevard Design. <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that a public open house was held in April 2007. At the <br />open house, there was a lot of concern from the business owners about the restricted access at <br />City Council Work Session / November 13, 2007 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.