Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Associate Planner DaInes stated it is up to the Commission but it is not intended. The way it is <br />written right now, any off premise sign requires a permit, but not a fee. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated the goal would be to not require a permit for on premise signs. <br />The idea of the permit is to control the amount of signs at one given place. She stated the <br />Planning Commission could regulate that. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed with staff the regulations for garage sale signs. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt wondered if someone would be able to apply for a permit online. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated it is not available at this time. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he was curious what they are trying to regulate. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated they are trying to limit the language limitation they have right <br />now and she is not trying to change the ordinance and make it stricter. <br />Chairperson,Nixt stated he would consider dealing with this in phases. <br /> <br />Mr. Bill Salter, 5919 177th Lane, stated his biggest concern with this is they adopt a lot of <br />regulations in the City and he wondered where the funding is to regulate this. He wondered if <br />this is really needed. He stated they have so many rules and regulations already. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt stated his concern is that any time they have a regulation and enforce it such <br />as the pennits, it will start to take up employee time and City money and pretty soon the City will <br />start looking for reimbursement and it will go back to a fee basis. <br /> <br />. Associate Planner DaInes stated the original intent it to not have any permits for any non- <br />commercial sign in residential districts. She reiterated that it is all up to the Commission <br />regarding how much or how little regulation they want to have. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated in looking at points 9.12.13 he thought they should cross out items <br />C and D because he did not understand the reasoning. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated he found this confusing also because it seemed to be a little in <br />contradiction to residential areas. <br /> <br />Associate Plamler DaInes stated that was before they allowed off premise signs. If they allow off <br />premise signs that was part ofthe stipulation that a permit would be involved. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if that statement is incorporated in what is presented to them. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated based on if it is a non-commercial speech sign it is. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 6, 2001 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />30 <br />