My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/06/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/06/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:42:29 AM
Creation date
11/30/2007 2:09:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/06/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />For multiunit commercial development, <br />some communities may consider establish- <br />ing a mandatory use list. Based on commu- <br />nity objectives for the downtown or central <br />business district, a use list may be drafted <br />to implement a desired mix. So, for example, <br />a new commercial development with 10 <br />units must have two units with uses from <br /> <br />help offset rent revenues that are below <br />market rate. <br /> <br />LEGAL ISSUES <br />Like any zoning or land-use regulation, special <br />provisions aimed at creating vibrant yet afford- <br />able downtowns and central business districts <br />must be sensitive to a number of legal issues. <br /> <br /> <br />use list A (that may include desired uses <br />such as pharmacies or grocery stores, or <br />affordable commercial space) and the rest <br />may be from the more open commercial cat- <br />egory (use list B). This could be a straightfor- <br />ward, effective approach if planners carefully <br />consider local market conditions. <br />As with a strictly incentives-based <br />approach, the success of a linkage or <br />mandatory approach likely will depend on <br />the degree to which it can help the devel- <br />oper recoup some of the costs of compli- <br />ance. For example, local governments might <br />draft regulations so that projects required to <br />provide affordable commercial space or pay <br />an in-lieu fee also receive an increase in <br />density. If increased density is not feasible <br />on-site, then perhaps affordable commercial <br />regulations could be tied to a transferable <br />development rights program. Similarly, local <br />governments may need to provide owner <br />incentives such as property tax breaks to <br /> <br />66 <br /> <br />Fortunately, these legal issues are not difficult <br />to address. For example, constitutional issues <br />such as substantive due process and equal <br />protection require that land-use regulations be <br />rationally related to legitimate objectives and <br />not discriminatory. Another constitutional con- <br />cern is the "takings" issue. However, regula- <br />tions like the ones discussed above should not <br />pose takings problems since they do not <br />threaten to wipe out all economically viable <br />use of the subject property. With respect to tak- <br />ings, however, these regulations are on safer <br /> <br />legal ground if they are legislatively adopted <br />and uniformly applied, as opposed to being <br />applied on an ad Iioe, discretionary basis. <br />Affordable-space requirements should also <br />have a sufficient nexus to the community's <br />need to accommodate a variety of commercial <br />users and should be roughly proportional to <br />such need. <br /> <br />Interstate Commerce <br />As discussed above, several communities <br />have implemented formula or c~ain business <br />restrictions to protect community character. <br />The courts, however, have a long history of <br />striking down state laws and local ordinances <br />that discriminate against out-of-state busi- <br />nesses. The reasoning behind such cases is <br />that Congress has exclusive authority to regu- <br />late interstate commerce. If local governments <br />were free to create disadvantages for out-of- <br />state businesses, interstate commerce would <br />suffer overall. As a result, zoning regulations <br />must be aimed at creating a healthy mix of <br />commercial uses rather than simply prohibit- <br />ing national chain restaurants on the belief <br />thatthere are quite enough Starbucks coffee <br />shops in the world. The goal should be to <br />assure that key areas such as downtowns and <br />business districts feature a variety of uses that <br />serve local residents and visitors, as well as <br />people of various income groups. <br /> <br />Case Law <br />A 2003 case from California, Coronadans <br />Organized for Retail Enhancement v. City of <br />Coronado, demonstrates the importance of <br />regulating local and out-of-state businesses <br />with an even hand. The City of Coronado <br />adopted certain restrictions on formula retail <br />businesses, defined as "a type of retail sales <br />activity or retail sales establishment (other <br />than a 'formula fast food restaurant') that is <br />required by contractual or other anrangement <br />to maintain any of the following: standardized <br />('formula') array of services and/or merchan- <br />dise, trademark, logo, service mark, symbol, <br /> <br />The goal should be to assure that k~y areas <br />such as downtowns and business districts <br />feature a variety of uses that serve local <br />residents and visitors, as well as people of <br />various income groups. <br /> <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 10.07 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.