Laserfiche WebLink
• om the 1Vfl~RAM database. <br />Board Member Bentz asked if the database errors were fr <br />Mr. Javens responded that there are problems with the Access database: He stated he <br />would be in contact with the people in the office and if necessary contact BWSR. He <br />,assured the EPB members that the bugs would be worked out of the program. <br />• Case #2: Establishing Top Soil Requirements in City,Code <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson reported that this came .about in' January 2006 <br />•when -the Public Works Committee was holding discussions with. the Engineering staff. <br />Ramsey is one of the largest users ofnon-consumptive water and imgation. <br />Chairperson McDilda asked how the water usage is determined. <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson stated that he was not quite certain, but would <br />clarify that. information with Civil Engineer II Linton. <br />Board Member Olds explained that the City goes through peak watering of 6.5 million <br />gallons of water per day in the summer, based on pumping through the water towers.;• <br />This usage does not include residential private wells, but is determined only on usage <br />based upon the volume and number of residential water meters in the City. <br />' Board Member Max asked if that was monitored and compared on a seasonal basis. . <br />Board Member Olds answered in the affirmative. <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson read an e-mail from the City Engineer Jankowski. <br />He stated according to the DNR, Ramsey ranks 13`h in the metro area in water use. In <br />2003, the city summer/winter water use ratio was 4.5. Tn 2005 it. decreased to 3:35 <br />presumably due partially to the education and sprinkling ban., The DNR wants this ratio <br />to drop down to no-more than 2.6. <br />Board Member Bentz stated that in January the usage was 2.6 million gallons. <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson stated that . the Public Works Committee <br />recommended that the City establish some topsoil requirements for new developments to <br />add moisture holding capacity to the soils. • .The recommendation of the Public Works <br />Committee, which was subsequently ratified by City Council in February of last year, <br />was that Chapter 9'of City Code be amended to require six (6) inches of topsoil (topsoil <br />would be defined as a sandy loam with .at least forty percent [40%] organic matter) in all <br />landscaped areas of new developments and that this be forwarded to the EPB for any <br />additional input: He asked for input from the EPB on this recommendation. <br />• Chairperson McDilda asked if there was precedence for this. <br />Environmental Policy Board/July 23, 2007 <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />-229- <br />