My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/12/1992
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1992
>
Agenda - Council - 05/12/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 8:59:38 AM
Creation date
7/23/2003 11:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/12/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />PRESENTATION TO CITY <br /> By: Ryan Schroeder, <br /> <br />ASSESSOR JOHN KEEFE <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br />As Council i~aware, we most recently completed the Board of Review process. This allows the <br />taxpayers th6 opportunity to discuss concerns as to the appropriateness, or lack thereof, of <br />property taX ~alu~ for purposes of tax assessment for values 1991, payable 1992. As you are also <br />aware, when[our icurrent Assessor John Keefe was hired on May 16, 1989, he was handed a <br />difficult sitaa!ion ~n that due to work load, the previous Assessor had not had the opportunity to <br />keep up to Sliced ion much of the assessment and therefore the ratios upon John's arrival were <br />dramatically put bf line. Due to this fact, John, along with the Council, has had to endure a <br />process ovor t~'heiI'ast three years of bringing the City of Ramsey into the modern era relative to <br />appraisal pradtic~.~, and appraisal values which follow and as are required by the State of Minnesota <br />and the Co~n!y 0fAnoka. John Keefe, as all of you are aware, has been more than up to the task <br />in that he hid va~sily improved procedures and assessment practices in both the commercial and <br />residential ar~,as Of this community pursuant to the resolution which is enclosed. <br /> <br />I would like ko add so Council is aware, that it has been my past practice in other cities, when <br />contemplating p~rchase of a property or easement, to contract with two separate appraisers to <br />arrive at a .va~ue and then to contract with a review appraiser in order to adjudge which of the first <br />two profess;~o~nallappraisals is more accurate. I have learned, through working with John, that this <br />is not nece.Cs~ ia the City of Ramsey with John Keefe as the City Assessor. I have asked John to <br />review each df th~ appraisals we have received for any pending land acquisition and I have asked <br />him to revi~-~ owner appraisals for eminent domain hearings. In each of these work orders I have <br />found Johrt's:~ critique to be more than competent and, in fact, the most thorough review of <br />appraisal wO~ I llave ever received. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff recom~end~ adopting a resolution recognizing City Assessor John Keefe for his production <br />and improve~ent~ to the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Council A~tiott: <br /> <br />Motion to adopt Resolution #92-05- recognizing the contributions of City Assessor John <br />Keefe. <br /> <br />Review CI!ecklist: <br />City AdministratOr <br /> <br />CC: 05/12/92 <br /> <br />Copies also distributed to: <br /> <br />City Assessor <br />Finance Officer <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.