Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Associate Planner DaInes thought it could be changed to reflect that. She reviewed what the <br />current code is in the City and how it would change with the new sign ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland wondered if someone could put up a sign for six weeks, take it <br />down for four and put it up again. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated with the current ordinance they would track it through a <br />permit. With the proposed ordinance they would not be requiring a permit or fee so she <br />would propose they go out once a month and record the signs to determine what signs have <br />been placed in the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if someone needed a temporary sign for six months, is that <br />permitted. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated it is not allowed, and would be considered a permanent <br />sign. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy wondered ifthere would be a way to have an exception for this. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated staff could explore this and come back with some <br />suggestions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt stated he understood but did not think someone would want to construct <br />a more permanent sign for six months. He thought there could be some type of permitting <br />process that could be done for this if they can show cause. He thought this may be <br />something that could be handled on the staff level. <br /> <br />The Commission indicated they would like to some sort of flexibility for longer sign display. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated the fifty square feet sign in a residential area is a big sign and <br />thought the size should be lowered. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated currently they do not have any sign size limit and by <br />indicating a size limit to fifty feet, this tightens up things. She stated if they start limiting <br />residential properties, they start limiting what was allowed in the past and that was what she <br />was trying to avoid was to make things stricter than what they were in the past. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated he was comfortable with the changes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer wondered if they could have Chairperson Nixt review this before an <br />approval was brought forward. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated staff could do this. <br /> <br />18 <br />