Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CASE#~ <br /> <br />RECEIVE RESULTS OF DIRT DRIVEWAY PAVING SURVEY <br />By; Steven Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The topic of promoting the paving of unpaved driveways within the City has been a topic <br />of discussion since the June 19, 2007 Public Works Committee meeting and was <br />subsequently discussed at the September 18,2007 and November 20,2007 Public Works <br />Committee meetings. At the latest meeting the Committee wished to determine the <br />degree of interest in paving by approving the mailing of a survey to be sent to properties <br />with one or more unpaved or partially paved driveways. The post office delivered the <br />attached survey and accompanying letter to 455 properties and 174 responses (38%) were <br />received. Of these responses five had reported that their driveways are now paved or are <br />in the process of being paved, and two reported that they lived on unpaved streets. <br /> <br />Recall that the cost of paving the first 50 feet of driveway might be expected to range <br />between $1,500 and $3,000. Also recall that the Engineering Department survey <br />conducted last summer provided the following information relative to the scope of the <br />unpaved driveway issue: <br />. There were a total of 498 unpaved driveways identified <br />. 366 unpaved driveways were the primary driveway for the property <br />. 132 unpaved driveways were secondary driveways <br />. 19 driveways were generally paved but had a short unpaved length between the <br />paved driveway and the street. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The attached sheet contains a summary of the survey responses to questions one through <br />four. In general, roughly two thirds ofthe respondents expressed an emphatic lack of <br />interest in pursuing the paving of their driveways. This compares to approximately 15% <br />of the respondents that expressed strong interest in wishing to have their driveway paved <br />and a similar percentage of respondents that were mildly interested in the concept (those <br />respondents which indicated a level of interest between 4 and 7)~ <br /> <br />There is a strong correlation in the response to Question #2 (Why isn't your driveway <br />paved?) with the opposition to driveway paving noted above. 68% of respondents stated <br />that they preferred an unpaved driveway or that having an unpaved driveway wasn't a <br />problem. Below is a summary of other reasons submitted by respondents to Question #2: <br />. Gravel or dirt drives are more environmentally friendly <br />. . Gravel or conbit should be considered adequate <br />. Anticipate relocating current drive or selling to a developer <br />. Unpaved drive is a second drive with minimal use <br />. Anticipate truck traffic which would damage a paved drive <br />. Rock or stone drives are aesthetic <br />. Street drains onto lot; paving drive would exacerbate problem <br /> <br />5 <br />