Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD <br /> <br />Case #3: ~: Elect Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for 1992 <br /> <br />Chief Griffi~ ~uggested the interview process take place to appoint the Citizen Boardmember, but <br />to make the ~l~is~n of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson at a later date; giving time to confer with <br />members of ~l~e F~e Department and also allowing a vote from a full F~re Board. <br />Consensus qf ~he ,Board was to table this case until the vacancy is filled on the Fire Board. <br /> <br />Case #4: ii~ Interview Citizen Boardmember <br /> <br />Boardmemb~ Person turned the meeting over to Councilmember Zimmerman. <br />The Board ihfervi~wed the following applicants to fill the vacancy of the Citizen Boardmember to <br />serve for th~'Year~1992: <br />Mr. Alan P~on <br />Mr. Willard ~freu <br />Mr. Bruce Hoeke <br /> <br />Mr. James ?~ordte, Ms. Cathy Gustafson and Mr. Russell Peterson were not present to be <br />interviewedJ~ <br />Consensus Of; thei Board was that they would like to meet and interview each of the candidates; <br />therefore a ~p~eci~l Fire Board meet,!ng was schedu!ed for Wednesday, February 26, 1992 at 7:00 <br />p.m. to inte~tew~those who couldn t attend tonight s meeting. <br /> <br />Case #1: ': ~ FOllow-up Discussion Regarding City Public Works Tanker <br /> <br />Chief Griffit3 Stat~l the Fire Department is not interested in putting money into the Public Works <br />tanker-to m~ it~oad wo..,rthY for the Fire Department. Instead they would like that money to go <br />into a fund~£0r ~ext year s budget for a new or different tanker. The tanker would be used <br />currently on[y. foremergency situations by the Fire Department. <br /> <br />Motion by ~d~,,. ember Kapler and seconded by Boardmember Simpson that the Fire Department <br />will not put lilOne.~ into the repair of the Public Works tanker to make it more "road worthy" for the <br />Fire Departr~ent (other than gas, lube & oil and related expenditures). The Fire Department will be <br />requesting a~i~ew Or newer vehicle within the 1993 Budget requests. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Noting Yes: Councilmember Zimmerman, Boardmembers Kapler, Simpson, <br />Pearson and~harp. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Peterson. <br />Case #2: !i Dlscussion Regarding the Request and Purpose of Responding to <br /> : R~scue Calls <br />Chief Griffih istat~l that the Fire Department has indicated they would like to respond to personal <br />injury and h~l~C*t attack victims. He met with Police Chief Auspos and Mr. Auspos' concern is not <br />wanting 20 ~op~e or so to show up at the scene. Chief Griffin stated that there would be about <br />five at a tim~ ~ho could respond. Chief Griffen felt this woule better the relationship between the <br />Police Dep~eot and the Fire Department. He informed the Board that Central Communications <br />will tone R~sey Fire Department as Ramsey Rescue, followed by the address to respond to, the <br />nature of th~ alarm and where an ambulance is being dispatched from. Ramsey Rescue will only <br />respond if a~'~ambulance is being dispatched. If the ambulance is requested to cancel, Ramsey <br /> <br />Fire Board/February 19, 1992 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />