My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/11/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 03/11/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:14:13 AM
Creation date
3/7/2008 1:29:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/11/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Background: <br />RECEIVE RESULTS OF DIRT DRIVEWAY PAVING SURVEY <br />By; Steven Jankowski, City Engineer <br />The topic of promoting the paving of unpaved driveways within the City has been a topic <br />of discussion since the June 19, 2007 Public Works Committee meeting and was <br />subsequently discussed at the September 18, 2007 and November 20, 2007 Public Works <br />Committee meetings. At the latest meeting the Committee wished to determine the <br />degree of interest in paving by approving the mailing of a survey to be sent to properties <br />with one or more unpaved or partially paved driveways. The post office delivered the <br />attached survey and accompanying letter to 455 properties and 174 responses (38 %) were <br />received. Of these responses five had reported that their driveways are now paved or are <br />in the process of being paved, and two reported that they lived on unpaved streets. <br />Recall that the cost of paving the first 50 feet of driveway might be expected to range <br />between $1,500 and $3,000. Also recall that the Engineering Department survey <br />conducted last summer provided the following information relative to the scope of the <br />unpaved driveway issue: <br />• There were a total of 498 unpaved driveways identified <br />• 366 unpaved driveways were the primary driveway for the property <br />• 132 unpaved driveways were secondary driveways <br />• 19 driveways were generally paved but had a short unpaved length between the <br />paved driveway and the street. <br />Observations: <br />The attached sheet contains a summary of the survey responses to questions one through <br />four. In general, roughly two thirds of the respondents expressed an emphatic lack of <br />interest in pursuing the paving of their driveways. This compares to approximately 15% <br />of the respondents that expressed strong interest in wishing to have their driveway paved <br />and a similar percentage of respondents that were mildly interested in the concept (those <br />respondents which indicated a level of interest between 4 and 7). <br />There is a strong correlation in the response to Question #2 (Why isn't your driveway <br />paved ?) with the opposition to driveway paving noted above. 68% of respondents stated <br />that they preferred an unpaved driveway or that having an unpaved driveway wasn't a <br />problem. Below is a summary of other reasons submitted by respondents to Question #2: <br />• Gravel or dirt drives are more environmentally friendly <br />• Gravel or conbit should be considered adequate <br />• Anticipate relocating current drive or selling to a developer <br />• Unpaved drive is a second drive with minimal use <br />• Anticipate truck traffic which would damage a paved drive <br />• Rock or stone drives are aesthetic <br />• Street drains onto lot; paving drive would exacerbate problem <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.