My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 01/10/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2008
>
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 01/10/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 2:30:50 PM
Creation date
3/12/2008 12:27:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
01/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Member Kiefer questioned what the goal of the median is. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley replied it is about traffic flow and increased safety. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley summarized that the EDA would request traffic studies, make a statement <br />against the construction of a median supporting the businesses, review studies from other cities, <br />involve traffic study experts, and identify the type of study to conduct. <br /> <br />Member Steffen questioned what the EDA would do with the data once gathered. He suggested <br />an RFP be written to hire a firm to consult on the study and evaluate the data. <br /> <br />Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney recommended the City confer with the League of <br />Minnesota Cities. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Riley, seconded by Member LeTourneau, to recommend to City <br />Council the following: <br /> <br />1) a seven-day traffic study be conducted in stead of a two day study <br />2) Staff try to locate traffic studies done that address median impacts <br />3) Staff work with local business to find solutions to the pending road improvements of <br />Sunfish Lake Boulevard. <br />4) Conduct a RFP, if necessary, to hire a consultant to do a meaningful traffic study. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members LeTourneau, Elvig, Kiefer, Steffen, <br />and Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: Member Schindel. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Riley, seconded by Member Elvig to direct staff to draft a strong business <br />support statement. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members Elvig, Kiefer, LeTourneau, Steffen, <br />and Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: Member Schindel. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />2008 EDA Work Plan <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan explained the requirement and importance of the <br />EDA Work Plan. He displayed a power point presentation on the 2008 EDA Work Plan, outlining <br />the successes and those items not completed in 2007. <br /> <br />Member Elvig questioned whether a cost benefit analysis is available on development incentives <br />and land purchases. He commented this is a great arena to demonstrate what the EDA is and what <br />it can do. He suggested supporting documents would be helpful. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan replied that a cost benefit analysis could be done for <br />most of the industrial parcels. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/January 10,2008 <br />Page 5 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.