Agenda - Council - 03/25/2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Case #3: Sunfish Commons Discussion Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan provided background information on the pending Sunfish Lake Boulevard road construction project. He stated as part of this project City Council requested traffic study. He reported that the Engineering Department traffic study would monitor in two hour increments, the morning, at noon and in the late afternoon. He also commented that looking at the timing of the lights, U -Turns, and access points could help mitigate impacts on the pending median construction. He asked the EDA to discuss the potential impacts of the median on businesses. Mr. Frank Yamoutpour, Shell Station, expressed his thoughts and concerns over the decision to construct the median. He questioned why this could not have been discussed prior to the City Council making a decision. Chairperson Riley stated the City had a discussion with the County prior to the City Council Making a decision. He explained that Anoka County's current construction standards are the driver behind the design of this project. Member Strommen commented the City was given the option to take over the road and pay for the road construction and maintenance. She stated this would amount to a significant loss of Federal, State, and County funding. Mr. Yamoutpour suggested that the City would lose significant tax revenue if the businesses in the area, including his own, had to close. City Administrator Ulrich replied property taxes would be paid by any subsequent owner. He commented that it would be difficult to determine the indirect dollar impact. Mr. Yamoutpour questioned whether the economic impact to the businesses was explored. Member Strommen replied the EDA is interested in determining how to mitigate the potential impact to businesses. She stated the EDA needs assistance from outside expertise for answers. Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan stated the EDA is a City body that focuses on the businesses and realizes there are potential problems as a result of the median. He stated the EDA needs to determine at what level it should participate in the studying the potential impacts of the median. He also stated that a study could be funded from the EDA's Budget if necessary. Member Strommen commented the EDA needs to bring in expertise to assist in developing plans given the traffic constraints. Chairperson Riley questioned who the City is dealing with relative to the traffic issues. City Administrator Ulrich replied it involves the County Board Members. He stated this issue would be faced time and again as businesses that rely on easy access go into areas. He explained that Mr. Yamoutpour's business did not fit into the criteria for acquisition through the RALF Economic Development Authority /January 10, 2008 Page3of7