My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/11/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2008
>
Minutes - Council - 03/11/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:56:00 PM
Creation date
3/27/2008 3:28:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />have a public hearing and then the Council can make a wise decision about any potential <br />consequences. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that according to City Code, the consequences are very limited in <br />scope and the only things the Council can do are revoke, suspend or nothing at all. He stated <br />that there isn't the ability to fine Diamonds, for example. He stated that he also was informed <br />that there had been discussion at the work session about the possibility of amending the CUP. <br />He stated that this process was set up for the applicant to come to the City and ask for an <br />amendment. He stated that after a public hearing, the Council could decide to revoke one or two <br />of the conditions in the permit. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that another option would be for the Council to pass a non- <br />binding resolution or send a letter of warning to the CUP holder, without holding a' public <br />hearing, that would indicate that any further actions or violations would result in public hearing <br />action. He noted that because there are two Councilmembers absent at tonight's meeting, there <br />will need to be four affirmative votes for an agenda item to pass. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilm~mber Look, seconded by Councilmember Jeffrey, to send a letter of <br />warning to Diamonds Bar and Grill, indicating that any further actions or violations will result <br />in a revocation hearing. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Councilmember Jeffrey stated that he does not feel a public hearing is <br />necessary, but would like this letter to be a formal reprimand letter. Councilmember Elvig stated <br />that Mr. Gruber indicated that he felt holding this type of event was acceptable under his current <br />CUP. He stated that he would like the letter to clear up the issue of what events can be held and <br />are acceptable under his current CUP. Interim Community Development Director Frolik stated <br />that snowboarding is not listed as a permitted use in their CUP. She stated that the CUP is pretty <br />specific about what type of activities would be allowed. Councilmember Elvig asked if <br />Councilmember Look would accept. an amendment to his motion to include language that <br />snowboarding events, tents with LP gas and the like are not allowed. He stated that he would <br />like to see some details in the letter so it is clear to everyone what is allowed. Councilmember <br />Look asked if Diamonds could have tents erected if they have a permit. Interim Community <br />Development Director Frolik confirmed that they can erect tents with the proper permit. <br />Councilmember Look stated that he would accept a frien.dly amendment to include language that <br />any sport events outside of the current CUP guidelines would need an additional permit. City <br />Attorney Goodrich suggested that the letter compare the events of March 1, 2008 with the <br />language in the CUP, to show exactly where Mr. Gruber was wrong in his violations. He stated <br />that there were also some fire safety hazards that were discovered. He stated that he thinks all of <br />this should be listed clearly, point by point, in the letter. Mayor Gamec stated that he would like <br />to have Diamonds sign and date the letter when they receive it, so it is clearly understood. <br />Councilmember Olson stated that if a public hearing has to hold the moniker of suspension or <br />revocation, then she is not in favor of it. She stated that she feels a letter is a good alternative. <br /> <br />Councilmembers Look and Jeffrey accepted a friendly amendment to the original motion, to <br />include language in the letter that any sporting events outside of the current CUP guidelines <br />would need an additional permit and list, point by point, where the current violations occurred. <br /> <br />City Council / March 11, 2008 <br />Page 14 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.