My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/22/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 04/22/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:17:41 AM
Creation date
4/18/2008 7:33:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/22/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Kiefer noted the City has some in -house signage capability that would reduce the cost <br />of signage. He stated he would like the EDA to support what can be done in terms of the signage. <br />In terms of the cost, he would be in favor of the EDA participating with the non -lit signage. He is <br />not certain that he would be in favor of participating with the lighted signage, but he would be <br />supportive of the activity. <br />Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan pointed out it would.be a thin line for the Board to <br />buy signage. He suggested that any participation of the EDA should be of a secondary nature, <br />and that the onus be put on the ownership group to make the signs. He noted it is a distinct <br />possibility that the signs will be temporary construction signs. <br />Member Strommen suggested investigating what would be routine signage for MnDOT or the <br />County to participate with, such as u -turn signs and temporary construction signs. She stated the <br />importance of being provided with firm numbers in order to make a decision regarding the <br />EDA's participation with the signage project. <br />Economic Development Director advised if the EDA determines to fully fund the signage project <br />it would be within the budget parameters to allocate the full $30,000 that has been estimated. <br />The Board expressed support of the signage plan as proposed in concept by the Sunfish <br />Commons ownership group, but that firm numbers on the signage plan are needed in order to <br />make a decision regarding the EDA's participation with the signage project. <br />Chairperson Riley commented that the increase in the existing pylon signage square footage does <br />not seem to be a request related to the median. <br />Member Strommen suggested waiving the conditional use permit application fee. She stressed <br />the importance of being careful about precedent and the need to be clear about what the EDA <br />would be paying for and why, even though this is a unique case. <br />There was discussion of the timeframe associated with the process for approval of the signage <br />plan, and that the next EDA meeting is scheduled in April. <br />Mr. Gandel stated Gaughan Companies would like to proceed as soon as possible. They will <br />begin today to engage a comprehensive signage plan to present to the EDA for review. <br />Consensus of the Board was that the Sunfish Commons signage plan be presented to the EDA <br />again with itemized costs and staff to determine how much the County and MnDOT would <br />participate in the non -lit signage, and that a special meeting be scheduled if necessary to <br />determine the percentage of EDA participation in the signage plan. <br />Case #3: Consider Sale of Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway North Industrial Park Plat 2 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan reviewed that the City has been working with Tag <br />Machine to locate a 10,000 to 15,000 square foot manufacturing facility to Gateway North <br />Economic Development Authority/February 14, 2008 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.