Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chairperson Johns stated that with the proximity and proposed underpass to Alpine Park she <br />thought that park development without a playground would meet the needs of the residents. <br /> <br />Commissioner Backous stated that there was a nice gazebo on the southern side and thought that <br />they should keep the northern area more natural. He explained that there are a lot of close <br />businesses in the area and advised that the employees could come to the park and eat lunch at the <br />gazebos. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock was in favor of keeping it passive and advised that as time goes on and <br />they gage what the actual use and wants will be they could always add things, such as non- <br />intrusive play structures to the park. <br /> <br />Jeff Schoenbauer advised that they can design the park with efficiency of land use in mind, <br />meaning that they could be very efficient with where they are placing things so that in time they <br />could add additional structures. <br /> <br />Parks Supervisor Riverblood advised that wildlife also would benefit from an underpass, <br />especially since Sunfish Lake Boulevard separates two wetlands. <br /> <br />Jeff Schoenbauer stated that they would stay with the theme elegant in a natural way and also <br />recognize that they would need to have a backup design plan in the case that the City is unable to <br />negotiate with the surrounding landowners at some point in the future. <br /> <br />Parks Supervisor Riverblood stated that Commissioner Backous brought up a good point about <br />the benefit to the employees of surrounding businesses. He explained that the park is currently <br />getting use from people who drive to the site during their lunch break and eat in their vehicles. <br />He stated that although they did not receive a lot of input from surrounding businesses, however <br />Cottonwood Park has seen a noticeable increase in daytime use from employees of several <br />businesses. He thought that the planning was well thought out. <br /> <br />Schoenbauer questioned if they should construct the parking lot in an area where there would be <br />a nice view if someot}e were to sit in their car to eat lunch. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock advised that if they were going to put in a parking lot already, why not <br />make it in an area where people would be able to do just that. <br /> <br />Jeff Schoenbauer stated that he was ready to move forward to the Council with the ideas they <br />have discussed and feltgood about the progress and the direction that they are moving in. <br /> <br />Riverblood reminded everyone that it's anticipated that the Commission's May meeting will be <br />at the lake, and will be an opportunity to reconcile the revised park plans on site. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Johns, Commissioners Erickson, Backous, Barr, <br />Hansen, LaMere, and Shryock. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Consider Support for Anoka Aquatic Center for 2008 <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/April 10, 2008 <br />Page 6 of 18 <br />