My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 06/03/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2008
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 06/03/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:00:46 PM
Creation date
6/11/2008 3:23:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
06/03/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF INPUT <br /> <br />Ramsey Royalty <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he had been contacted by someone who would like to start a Ramsey <br />Royalty program. He stated that she stated that she would run it and work out all the financing. <br /> <br />Management Intern Gladhill asked if this would be in conjunction with Happy Days. <br /> <br />Mayor Ganiec stated that he wasn't sure, but he did tell her that the City didn't have any money <br />to help support the program. <br /> <br />Business License Renewal <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that he had gotten a call from Service Team of Professionals that <br />was recently issued a citation because they neglected to renew their business license. He stated <br />that it costs $15 for a renewal and there seems to have been a mix up, in this case, because. they <br />have a canceled check. He stated that his question is whether it makes sense for the City to take <br />someone to court over a $15 renewal fee. <br /> <br />CounCilmember Elvig stated that he has a similar situation with a dentist, who didn't pay <br />attentfon to the paperwork sent that told her she needed to renew her license. He stated that she <br />filed it away and she admits to not getting this renewed, but did not think it was a big deaL He <br />I <br />state~ that she got a citation for a petty misdemeanor and is upset. <br />I <br /> <br />COIlnpunity Development Director Miller stated that businesses get a few notices before the <br />citation is issued. <br />! <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that his point is that the City will spend a fair amount of money <br />trying to bring this to court for a $15 fee. He suggested that the City consider a 5 year renewal <br />beca~se he thinks if the City tries to prosecute this, it will just lose money. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that staff will take a look at a multi-year renewal option. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked why the City required businesses to pay $15 for renewaL <br /> <br />City ~dministrator Ulrich stated that this is so the City has an accurate record of businesses in <br />town.! <br />I <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that it is also for cases where there is a fire or some kind of emergency, so <br />the City can contact the owner. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that the City has annual inspections by the fire marshal and asked <br />why he couldn't also collect their $15 when he is on site. He suggested that perhaps the City <br />can just issue another fine if they are late with their renewal fee, rather than turning it into a legal <br />Issue. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / June 3, 2008 <br />Page 14 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.