My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 06/03/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2008
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 06/03/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:00:46 PM
Creation date
6/11/2008 3:23:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
06/03/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Police Chief Way stated that they do include labor costs, but not necessarily City labor costs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked if the City had been paid back any of these costs. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way stated that, to his knowledge, the City has been paid back on a few of the <br />mown grass abatements. <br /> <br />CouncilmemberDehen asked what the City has done to request payment. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way stated that notices have been sent to property owners. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that there will be an assessment hearing in September and these <br />can be put onto their property taxes, similar to a water assessment. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way noted that the City had held six administrative hearings. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig noted the number of cleared ordinance complaints. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that the first abatement hearing was not a clean up project, but on <br />the possible revocation of the pawnbroker license. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey asked if the City was able to charge back the fees for the costs associated <br />with the hearings. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that the hearing for the pawnbroker have not been charged back. <br />He noted that for items 2,3,4 and 5 on the list, the City geared up for hearings, and had a hearing <br />officer present, but were able to settle them, similar to a pre-trial situation. He stated that <br />because of these, there have been talks about streamlining the internal process so there doesn't <br />need to be as much time and money spent getting witnesses and exhibits set up. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that the abatement process should have a requirement for the <br />defendant to produce information about what they feel their defenses are, so the City doesn't <br />have such heavy costs going in. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the City could start doing this more thoroughly and noted that <br />this is a civil hearing process. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way stated that this is a learning process and he has started asking more questions <br />as to why people want to have a hearing, so he thinks the number of hearings will be kept down. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he knows the City Attorney's fees cannot be recouped, but <br />asked if the hearing examiner fees could be recouped. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way stated that he was unsure how this could be done and still give people due <br />process. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / June 3, 2008 <br />Page 2 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.