My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/24/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 06/24/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:22:24 AM
Creation date
6/20/2008 2:14:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/24/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
364
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review; Case of Anderson Dahlen, Inc. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Management Intern Gladhill stated that Anderson Dahlen is proposing an expansion to their <br />existing building located at 6850 Sunwood Drive, just west of Bunker Lake Blvd. <br /> <br /> <br />ximately 6.75 acres in size, <br />s. Warehouse and office <br />g a Minor Subdivision to <br />roperty, which would <br />rties. <br /> <br />Anderson Dahlen is a stainless steel manufacturer. Their <br />located in the E-2 Employment District and is owned by <br />uses are both permitted uses in this district. The a t <br />re-plat the existing property to accommodate the <br />be reduced in size if the Minor Subdivision is a <br /> <br />The existing building is 84,030 square feet in SI <br />square feet in size. Once constructed, the site <br />City Code permits coverage up to 45%. The su <br />parking setbacks required in the E-2 District. <br /> <br />be 54,524 <br /> <br />The site currently has two accesses onto <br />for the type and size of building propo <br />plan with an additional 21 proof of par <br /> <br />The drainage, grading, utility, <br />outlined in the Staff Review Le <br /> <br />quest, contingent upon conformance with the City <br /> <br />IS was pretty straightforward and thought staff will work with <br />ing is taken care of and he was pretty comfortable with this. <br /> <br />Commissioner V <br />were any questions reg <br /> <br />ated there was another staff review letter and he wondered if there <br />mg that. <br /> <br />Mr. Knoll stated he did not have any questions regarding the review letter. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2008 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br /> <br />-168- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.