Laserfiche WebLink
Motion ~it Commissioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen to amend #1 <br />to reflect :IWo!!~orses instead of one. <br />Motion ~d. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Terry, Hendriksen, <br />DeemerS..~-Ioll~nd, LaDue, Terry and Thorud. <br /> <br />Motion b~ Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #16 to <br />read "That t~ie proposed maintenance of horses on the subject property will not be <br />hazardo0~ ~ to ~xisting or future neighboring uses. <br />Motion ~[rri~d. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, <br />Hendrikil~, ~olland, LaDue and Thorud. <br /> <br />Motion I~ C~mmissioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Thorud to amend #17 to <br />read TI~ th~iproposed construction and maintenance of a metal accessory structure on the <br />subject 1~ pe~ty will be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses '. <br /> <br />Further diilcu~ion: Commissioner Deemer felt that the consensus of the Commission was <br />that the ~t~tal~tccessory structure should not be allowed. Commissioner Hendriksen stated <br />that it c~[d r~ad will not be hazardous but is disturbing to existing or future neighboring <br />uses and itliat i~is inconsistent with desired character. <br /> .I <br />Motion anh second withdrawn. <br />Motion Co~missioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen to strike all <br />findings. ~17.~[~ 19, 21, 23 and 25) that speak to metal structures and add one finding to <br />read: '"I tt it~ approved, erection of a metal accessory structure on the subject property <br />would n~ be':~onsistent with past and current enforcement policies for like size parcels <br />(less thafi~. ).5 acres in size). <br />Motion e!~'ie~. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Hendriksen, <br />Holland, ~12pD~e, Terry and Thorud. Voting No: None. <br />Morion byiCo~m~sstoner Thorud and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #18 to <br />read "Tfi~ t~e proposed maintenance,, of horses on the subject property will not <br />substantigll, y a~versely impair the use... <br />Motion Ca~rie.~. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Thorud, Terry, <br />Deemer, I~ndfiksen, Holland and LaDue. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion bit ~or~missioner Hendriksen and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #20 <br />to read "Tt~at ~e proposed maintenance of horses on the subject property will not create <br />excessiv~ddi~ional r,e, quirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will <br />not be deffimefital ...' <br />Motion c~ied.. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Hendriksen, Terry, <br />Deemer, H~0'-~ lla.~d, LaDue and Thorud. Voting No: None. <br />Motion by ~2ommissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen to amend <br />#22 to re~ "T~at the proposed maintenance of horses on the subject property will not <br />involve u~, activities, processes, materials and equipment that will be detrimental to any <br /> <br />persons, ~pe/'ty..." <br /> <br /> ~ : <br /> <br />Zoning Commission/November 5, 1992 <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />