My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/08/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 07/08/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:22:43 AM
Creation date
7/3/2008 12:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/08/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merno <br />To: Ramsey City Council <br />From: William K. Goodrich, City Attorney <br />Re: 160 Lane <br />Date: July 8, 2008 <br />Randall dnd, Goodrich, . 'L. G. <br />The City owns 66 feet . of right of way for 160 Lane lying between the Dusbabek parcel on <br />the north, the Kaas parcel on the south and the plat of Trapper's Ridge on the west which is the Bauer <br />parcel. Please refer to the attached location map. <br />As of this date, the City has not constructed a public street on it right of way. Greg Bauer has <br />constructed a driveway on the right of way. The Bauer's and Kaas's use the driveway fbr,alternate <br />accesses to their respective parcels. <br />As stated in the July 8, 2008 City Council case, the Bauer's and Kaas's have had disagreement <br />on use of the right of way /driveway and submitted their disagreement to mediation. These two parties <br />through the mediation agree that the City improve 160 Lane and maintain it, like any other City <br />street. <br />If the City accepts the neighbor's mediation agreement, there appears to be no legal issue as <br />the City would construct and maintain the street as with any other City street. <br />However, the legal issues are more complex if the City elects to NOT treat 160 Lane as a <br />typical City street. That is, if the City agrees to permit Mr. Bauer to construct the street to a lesser <br />standard than typical City streets and in addition determines not to maintain 160 Lane as a typical <br />City street, legal issues are presented. <br />The primary legal issue is that of the City's liability. The question is, what liability, if any, <br />does the City assume by authorizing a City street to be constructed to less than City standards <br />and then permit members of the public to maintain the street? Not only is liability an issue for <br />persons who may be injured on the street itself as a result of its construction standards, the City could <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.