Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APPENDIX B <br /> <br />Street Maintenance Program Assessment' Practices <br /> <br />1. Projects are identified by individual subdivision, or by grouping of subdivision and lots <br />having similar pavement histories and conditions and similar pavement areas per benefited <br />unit. <br /> <br />2. An assessment share will be calculated by determining the total assessable cost of the <br />project and dividing by the number of benefited units. <br /> <br />3. Where an individual lot has more than one frontage anduot all frontages are scheduled to <br />receive an improvement or the same type of improvements, the lot will be considered <br />benefited and be assessed a full share for the improvement which is conducted along the <br />frontage of the lot that contains the main driveway opening. <br /> <br />4. For overlays the amount assessed to benefited property owner is 50% of the total project <br />cost including overhead costs. (1991). <br /> <br />5. For sealcoats the assessment to benefited property owner shall be 43% of the total project <br />cost including overhead costs in program year 2008, and shall be reduced by 7% in each <br />successive year until reduced to an 8% assessment in program year 2013. after the 2013 <br />program there shall be no assessment for sea1coats. (2007). <br /> <br />6. Projects involving streets which have had previous proposed maintenance projects defeated <br />by petition shall be ineligible to receive the City's 50% contribution, if the project requires a <br />more expensive maintenance. (i.e. streets proposed for sea1coating project which was <br />defeated by citizen petition now are proposed for a bituminous overlay) (1993) <br /> <br />7. Where the rule of dividing the assessable project cost by the number of benefited Lmits (no. 2 <br />above) would result in an assessable share which is grossly out of proportions to the <br />assessable share being charged to similar lots receiving similar improvements, the City <br />Council may elect to assess such lots the .average assessable share being made to lots <br />receiving similar improvements for that project year. (1996) <br /> <br />8. Where a benefited area contains commercial lots having widely varying sizes, the <br />assessment shall be made based on area of the lot. (2003) <br /> <br />9. Where ,an individual <br />or:e,oJ.1l1tyiro' . <br />sharewUrbe" <br /> <br /> <br />ta . e incl~4in~..a; c.tri'f~)Y~y.ft9l"ltage?l"l a state <br />'n~.~Jla{~,li!$$.~$Sm~t <br /> <br />36 <br />