My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/22/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 07/22/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:23:17 AM
Creation date
7/17/2008 2:01:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/22/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
267
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amount of attention required to read roadside advertisements could lead to driving <br />errors that could cause crashes. . <br />"71~.e enorna.ous flexibility of display possessed by CEVMS <br />makes it possible to use them in ~a~ays t1~.at can att~•act <br />drivers' attention at greater distar7ces, hold their attention <br />longe~•, and deliver a eider variet)~ of information anal <br />ia~zage stimuli than is possible by tJ~.e use of conventi.o~zal <br />advertising sigi2s. " <br />Texas Transportation Institute for FHWA, Impacts of Using Dynamic Features to <br />Display Messages on Changeable Message Signs (Dudek et al., 2005) iZ <br />This study exanlined the comprehension times for. three different scenarios .for <br />DOT-operated changeable message signs. The scenarios evaluated were: <br />• Flashing an entire one-phase message <br />• Flashing one line of a one-phase message while tt~~o other lines of the message remain <br />constant <br />• Alternating text on one line of athree-line CMS while keepuzg the other two lines of <br />text constant on the second phase of the message <br />The findings of this study «lere; <br />• Flashuig messages did not produce faster reading times. <br />• Flashing messages may have an adverse effect on message comprehension for <br />unfamiliar drivers. <br />• Average reading, times for flashing line messages and two-phase messages were. <br />significantly longer than for alternating.messages... <br />• Message comprehension was negatively affected by flashing 1u7e messages. <br />~uliile this research did not- evaluate advertising-related signs, it does. demonstrate that <br />flashing signs require more of the driver's time and attention to comprehend the message. <br />In the case of electronic billboards; this suggests that billboards that flash may require <br />more time and, attention to read than static ones. <br />3.3.1 OTHER INFORMATION <br />NHTSA Driver Distraction Internet Forum (2000)13 <br />The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration held an Internet forum to gather <br />research aild public comment related to. driver distraction with an emphasis on the use of <br />cell phones,.navigation systems; «~ireless hiternet and other in-vehicle devices. During <br />this forum, participants were invited to take a poll to determine the most prominent driver <br />X12 <br />-220- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.