Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Case # 4 <br /> <br />Consider Acquisition of Water Tower Parcel <br />By: Sean Sullivan, Economic Development Coordinator <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />City Council authorized the award of contract for engineering services, and the undertaking of a <br />feasibility study for the construction of a water tower in Elmcrest Park on April 22, 2008. During the <br />site investigation it was found that the soils. in the proposed location of the tower were unsuitable for <br />standard construction practices. The cost to construct the tower in the proposed location has <br />increased by approximately $400,000 for the installation of piles to support the structure and carry <br />the load to the underlying suitable soils. <br /> <br />Staff worked with our geotechnical consultant on three alternative locations in the area that may be <br />more suitable to reduce the additional cost of pilings. Of the three locations explored only one came <br />back with favorable restilts, 16600 St. Francis Boulevard. In addition to having better soils this site is <br />also approximately 10' higher than the previously proposed location within the park. Therefore, it <br />would not only reduce the cost for the foundation system, but the additional elevation would also <br />reduce the overall.cost of the tower construction. The initial indication is that for every foot of <br />elevation gained there is a $10,000 savings, resulting in another savings of approximately $100,000. <br /> <br />This parcel is owned by Oakwood Land Development and it currently sits vacant, aside from some <br />minor storage in the outbuilding, and John Peterson has stated that he is open to the City acquiring all <br />of the property. He currently has a mortgage on the land so any discussions would also have to be <br />approved by the mortgage holder. <br /> <br />The EDA agrees that the construction of a water tower in this area is important. The EDA discussed <br />acquiring the 14.2 acre parcel, and possibly more, as part of a larger project for the 167~Commercial <br />node. The EDA is currently waiting for the results of the Buxton Study to make a determination on <br />whether or not there is a market that needs to be expanded in that area. Staffwas directed to obtain <br />an appraisal of the property owned by Oakwood Land development south of 167th Avenue at the July <br />10 EDA meeting. The land consists of 3 parcels and the appraised values and scenarios are listed <br />below: .. . <br /> <br />1) 16600 St Francis Blvd (14.2 Acres) - W/Sewer $915,000 - W/O Sewer $683,741-$863,208 <br />2) 16601 Quicksilver St (26.4 Acres) - W/Sewer $1,128,000 - W/O Sewer $900,785-$1,077,113 <br />3) 16651 Quicksilver ~t (3.1 Acres) - W/Sewer $368,000 - W/O Sewer $328,000-$359,000 <br /> <br />Total acquisition cost for the entire 43.7 acres of the property with Sewer is $2,411,000. The range in cost if sewer <br />is not provided is $1,913,311-$2,299,316. <br /> <br />A copy of the full appraisal can be requested for review. The value breakdowns are based on Sewer <br />being there now versus it coming at a later date. For the two properties on Quicksilver Streetthere <br />are separate appraisals for the houses that are included in the total acquisition cost. In the appraisal it <br />is assumed that in all cases the Sewer will be there at some point. The balance of the EDA budget at <br />the end of 2008 is estimated to be $1,182,297, so there are significant funds available for the <br />purchase of this parcel. However, it is important to note that the EDA has expressed the need for the <br />purchase of future industrial land, so utilizing the EDA budget in its entirety might not be prudent. <br />Perhaps a partnership with the BRA or a reduction in the land purchased could be a mutually <br />beneficial solution to all parties involved. <br /> <br />25 <br />