My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/04/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2008
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/04/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:45:48 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 1:31:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/04/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TheConsisten'cy Doctrine: <br />Merging Intentions with Actions <br /> <br />By Lora A. Lucero, AICP <br /> <br />The zoning ordinance is the primary tool that communities use to regulate where, when, <br />and how they will grow and develop. <br /> <br />prehensive plan is supreme, the constitution for <br />the community:The tools-zoning, subdivision, <br />capital improvements, impact fees, and oth- . <br />ers-must be consis~ent with the plan, rather <br />than inconsistent with or blind to the plan. <br /> <br />What role does the comprehensive (or gen- <br />eraO plan play in the development review <br />process? <br />This issue of Zoning Practice discusses <br />the disconnections between plans and zoning <br />ordinance!i and recommends that states and <br />local communities put teeth into their plans by <br />adopting the consistency doctrine: the logical <br />. connection or relationship between compre- <br />hensive plans and the regulatory tools <br />designed to implement those plans. The com- <br /> <br />THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MUST <br />BE IMPLEMENTED; IF NOT, WHY PLAN? <br />In a democratic society, the residents of the <br />community express their goals for the future <br />by participating in a public planning process <br />culminating iri the <br />adoption of the com- <br />prehensive plan, and <br />by electing members of <br />a local governing body <br />to implement that plan. <br />Local officials .imple- <br />ment the community~s <br />plan by approving the <br />capital infrastructure <br />budget, adopting land- <br />use regulations such as <br />zoning and subdivision <br />ordinances, and <br />approving or rejecting <br />development applica- <br />tions. Connecting <br />development and land- . <br />use "decisions to the <br />adopted plan is the <br />best way to achieve the <br />community's goals, or <br />at leastto increase the <br />odds of achieving <br />them. <br />Failing to plan or <br />successfully implement <br />the comprehensive <br />plan can have serious <br /> <br /> <br />108 <br /> <br />consequences. The challenges and opportuni- <br />ties confronting communities are more diffI. <br />cult and complex today than ever before. <br />Professor John R. Nolan from Pace University <br />School of Law notes in the January 2008 issue <br />of Planning & Environmental Lawthat, in just <br />35 years,' <br /> <br />. . . the nation's population will grow by 100 <br />million people: an increase of33 percent <br />The private sector will produce:forthese new <br />Americans over 70 million homes and over <br />100 billion square feet of offices, stores, fac- <br />. tories, institutions, hotels, and resorts. <br />Researchers predictthat two-thirds ofthe <br />structures inexistence in 2050 will be built <br />between now and then. <br /> <br />This growth cannot proceed randomly with- <br />out great cost to the economy, 'environment, <br />and public health. This is neither an ideolog- <br />ic'al nor a political issue. The consequences <br />of haphazard development are not popular <br />with the vast majoritY of,Americans. .They <br />complain about the results of current growth <br />patterns: an increase of asthma and' obesity <br />among the young, traffic congestion that <br />stalls commuters, insufficient housing for <br />the workforce and the elderly, the decline of <br />cities as economic and cultural centers, <br />threats to drinking water quality and quan- <br />tity,reduced habitats and wetlands, higher <br />incidences of flooding, rampant fossil fuel <br />consumption, and an ever-larger carbon <br />footprint. (emphasis added). <br /> <br />Communities prepare and adopt com- <br />prehensiv.e plans to address these challenges <br />and to balance the competing interests in a <br />fair and democratic fashion. The public <br />expects that the goals and policies of the plan <br />will be successfully implemented, as evi- <br />denced by the countless hours, days, and <br />weeks many volunteer to engage in the como' <br />munity's plan.ning process. Butafter the plan <br /> <br />ZONING PRACTICE 8.08 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.